International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research
International Association of Educators

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2022, Vol. 17(2) 8-30

Comparison of Preservice Science and Social Studies Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues

Kader Birinci Konur & Sinem Tüfekçi

pp. 8 - 30   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2022.442.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2110-17-0002.R1

Published online: June 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 188  |  Number of Download: 368

Save PDF

Abstract

In this study, the views and attitudes of pre-service science and social studies teachers towards socioscientific issues were examined. Descriptive research design was used in the study. The quantitative data were collected with the "Attitude Scale towards Socioscientific Issues" and the qualitative data of the research were collected with a questionnaire consisting of 5 open-ended questions. 215 science and 220 social studies teacher candidates participated in the research. While qualitative data were analysed descriptively, SPSS program was used in the analysis of quantitative data. As a result of the research, pre-service teachers did not consider their knowledge of sociological issues sufficient and that there were deficiencies in the education system. As a result of the analyses, a significant difference was uncovered in favour of science teacher candidates in the worry sub-dimension related to socioscientific issues and it was determined that the worry level of science teacher candidates was higher than social teacher teachers.

Keywords: Socioscientific subjects, Attitude, Preservice teachers

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Konur, K.B. & Tufekci, S. (2022). Comparison of Preservice Science and Social Studies Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(2), 8-30. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2022.442.1

Harvard
Konur, K. and Tufekci, S. (2022). Comparison of Preservice Science and Social Studies Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(2), pp. 8-30.

Chicago 16th edition
Konur, Kader Birinci and Sinem Tufekci (2022). "Comparison of Preservice Science and Social Studies Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 17 (2):8-30. doi:10.29329/epasr.2022.442.1.
References
  1. Albe, V. (2008). Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17(8-9), 805-827. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alaçam-Akşit, A. C. (2011). Preservice primary school teachers' views on socioscientific issues and their teaching. [Master's thesis], Ege University, Institute of Social Sciences, İzmir.  [Google Scholar]
  3. Anagün, S. Ş., & Özden, M. (2010). Teacher candidates’ perceptions regarding socioscientific issues and their competencies in using socioscientific issues in science and technology instruction. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 981-985. [Google Scholar]
  4. Atasoy, Ş., Tekbıyık, A., & Yüca, O. Ş. (2018). Determination of students' informal reasoning on some local socioscientific issues in the Black Sea region: HEPP, organic tea and green road project. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(2), 524-540. https://doi.org/ 10.16986/HUJE.2018045573. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Bakırcı, H., Artun, H., Şahin, S., & Sağdıç, M. (2018). Examination of seventh grade students' views on socioscientific issues through science teaching based on common knowledge structuring model. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 6(2), 207-237. htps://doi:10.14689/issn.2148 - 2624.1.6c2s10m [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Cebesoy, Ü. B., & Dönmez Şahin, M. (2013). Investigation of science teacher candidates' attitudes towards socioscientific issues in terms of various variables. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 37(37), 100-117. [Google Scholar]
  7. Çepni, Z., & Geçit, Y. (2020). Social studies teacher candidates' attitudes and views regarding socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 42, 133-154. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2009). High school students informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eş, H., Mercan, S. I., & Ayas, C. (2016). A new socioscientific debate for Turkey: Life with nuclear. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(2), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.92919. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Genç, M., & Genç, T. (2017). Content analysis of studies on socio-scientific issues in Turkey. Kafkas University Journal of Kafkas Educational Studies, 4(2), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.291772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Gülhan, F. (2012). Investigation of the effect of scientific debate on socioscientific issues on 8th grade students' science literacy, tendency to scientific discussion, decision-making skills, and sensitivity to science-society problems. [Master's Thesis], Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Istanbul. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kapıcı, H. Ö., & İlhan, G. O. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward socioscientific issues and their views about nuclear power plants. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(5), 642-652. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.642. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Kaya, M., & Sürmeli, H. (2019). The effect  of  socio-scientific  issues  based  science  education  on  7th grade students’ enviromental literacy levels. Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(32), 1723-1736. http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.1375. [Google Scholar]
  14. Keefer, M. (2003). Moral reasoning and case-based approaches to ethical instruction in science. D.L. Zeidler (Ed.). The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education (pp.241-260). Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kılıç, M. (2019). The opinions of science teachers about teaching socioscientific issues and examining these issues in the teaching environment. [Master's Thesis], Mersin University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Mersin. [Google Scholar]
  16. Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multiple assessment of scientific content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues-based instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1017-1043. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolsto, S.D. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689-1716. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, M.K., & Erdogan, I. (2007). The effect of sciencetechnology-society teaching on students’ attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1315-1327. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nielsen, J.A. (2012a). Arguing from Nature: The role of ‘nature’ in students’ argumentations on a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 723-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.624135. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nielsen, J.A. (2012b). Science in Discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socio-scientific discussions. Science Education, 96(3), 428-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). Chemieim Kontext-A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041-1062. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sadler, T.D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 513-536. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sadler, T.D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 353-376. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sıbıç, O. (2017). The opinions of pre-service science teachers towards socioscientific issues and socioscientific issues-based teaching. [Master's Thesis], Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tekin, N., & Aslan, O. (2019). Examination of teacher candidates' attitudes towards socioscientific issues in terms of various variables. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 29(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. Tezel, Ö., & Günister, B. (2018). A Review on the Socioscientific Subject-Based Science Teaching Studies Carried out in Turkey. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Turkish World Application and Research Center (ESTÜDAM) Education Journal, 3(1), 42-60.  [Google Scholar]
  27. Topçu, M. S. (2010). Development of attitudes towards socioscientific issues scale for undergraduate students. Evaluation and Research in Education, 23(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500791003628187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Topçu, M. S. (2015). Socioscientific Issues and Teaching. Pegem Publications, 1. Edition, ISBN: 978-605-318-020-3, 96s. 6-14. [Google Scholar]
  29. Topçu, M. S., Muğaloğlu, E. Z., & Güven, D. (2014). Socioscientific issues in science education: Turkey example. Journal of Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 14(6), 2327-2348. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.6.2226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Turan, B. (2012). Determining and comparing the scientific thinking habits of primary school teacher candidates using socioscientific issues. [Master's Thesis], Blacksea Technical University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Trabzon. [Google Scholar]
  31. Türksever, F. (2019). Examination of prospective teachers' opinions and attitudes on socioscientific issues and their value judgments on world citizenship. [Master's Thesis], Adnan Menderes University, Institute of Science, Aydın. [Google Scholar]
  32. Walker, K., & Zeidler, D.L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yapicioglu, A. E. (2016). The views and reflections of preservice science teachers regarding implementations of socioscientific issue based instructions. Hacettepe Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 133-151. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yapicioglu, A.E., & Aycan, S. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ decisions and types of informal reasoning about the socioscientific issue of nuclear power plants. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.137.2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  35. Yerdelen, S., Cansız, M., Cansız, N., & Akçay, H. (2018). Promoting preservice teachers’ attitudes toward socioscientific issues. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.387465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Yıldırım, A., & Şimsek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publications. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yolagiden, C. (2017). Investigation of the relationship between teacher candidates' science learning skills, science literacy and attitudes towards socioscientific issues. [Master's Thesis]. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Institute of Science, Kahramanmaraş. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 74-101. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 17 Issue 2

June 2022

All Articles

Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.