International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research
International Association of Educators

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2018, Vol. 13(4) 164-185

The Relationship between Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Vocabulary of Learners of Turkish as Foreign or Second Language

Muhammet Raşit Memiş

pp. 164 - 185   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.178.10   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1811-14-0002

Published online: December 28, 2018  |   Number of Views: 532  |  Number of Download: 1106

Save PDF

Abstract

The aim of this study is to find out which vocabulary learning strategies learners of Turkish in Turkey and abroad use, to compare and contrast vocabulary learning strategies used by these two group of learners, to determine whether learners’ use of vocabulary learning strategies are influenced by a set of variables including age, gender, language level, and another foreign language learnt, and to identify the relationship, if any, between vocabulary and the use of vocabulary learning strategies. This study used a relational screening model that allows drawing comparisons and correlations. The data were collected in 2017-2018 using the Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning Strategies Scale developed by Kocaman and Kızılkaya-Cumaoğlu (2014) and vocabulary tests designed by the researcher considering different language levels. The sample consisted of 182 learners of Turkish in Turkey and abroad. In the analysis of the data, parametric and nonparametric tests were used together on the basis of the normality distribution of the data. The data were analyzed using the t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Tukey’s test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and correlation analysis. The analysis results showed that the mean frequency of strategy use was medium, the type and frequency of strategies used by the learners varied according to language levels, gender and the place of learning Turkish (in Turkey or abroad) had a limited and statistically insignificant effect on the use of strategies, previous learning of another foreign or second language has an effect on the use of vocabulary learning strategy, the place of learning led to a significant variation in vocabulary achievement, and there was a strong, positive and significant correlation between the use of vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary.

Keywords: Vocabulary learning strategies, vocabulary, teaching Turkish as foreign or second language.

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Memis, M.R. (2018). The Relationship between Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Vocabulary of Learners of Turkish as Foreign or Second Language . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(4), 164-185. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2018.178.10

Harvard
Memis, M. (2018). The Relationship between Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Vocabulary of Learners of Turkish as Foreign or Second Language . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(4), pp. 164-185.

Chicago 16th edition
Memis, Muhammet Rasit (2018). "The Relationship between Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Vocabulary of Learners of Turkish as Foreign or Second Language ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 13 (4):164-185. doi:10.29329/epasr.2018.178.10.
References
  1. Alamdari, Z. S. (2010). The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies employed by university level English language learners and their success (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barcroft, J. (2009). Strategies and performance in intentional L2 vocabulary learning. Language Awareness, 18(1), 74-89. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baskın, S., İşcan, A., Karagöz, B., & Birol, G. (2017). The use of vocabulary learning strategies in teaching Turkish as a second language. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9), 126-134. [Google Scholar]
  4. Biçer, N., & Polatcan, F. (2015). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde kelime öğrenme stratejilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 54, 811-828. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bozgeyik, Y. (2011). The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary proficiency (Unpublished master thesis). Gaziantep University, Gaziantep. [Google Scholar]
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (8th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  8. Can, A. (2017). Spss ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, J. S. (2014). An investigation of factors in vocabulary learning strategies use impacting undergraduate English major's performance on vocabulary tests in Taiwan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University, Belfast, Northern Ireland. [Google Scholar]
  10. Coady, J. (1993). Research in ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: Putting it in context. In T. Huckin, M. Hynes & J.Coady (Eds), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp.3-23). Norwood: NJ: Ablex. [Google Scholar]
  11. Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N. C. (1994). Implicit and explicit language learning – An overview. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 1-31). London: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Graves, M. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gu, Y. (1994). Vocabulary learning strategies of good and poor Chinese EFL learners. TESOL Annual Meeting, 8(12), 1-27. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996) Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 643-679. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamzah, M. S. G., Kafipour, R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 39-50. [Google Scholar]
  17. Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hermann, F. (2003). Differential effects of reading and memorization of paired associates on vocabulary acquisition in adult learners of English as a second language. TESL-EJ, 7(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hulstijn, J. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349-381). Malden: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  21. Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Kavramlar, İlkeler, Teknikler. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kocaman, O., & Kızılkaya Cumaoğlu, G. (2014). Yabancı dilde kelime öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 293-303. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kocaman, O., Yıldız, M., & Kamaz, B. (2018). Use of vocabulary learning strategies in Turkish as a foreign language context. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(2), 54-63. [Google Scholar]
  24. Komol, T., & Sripetpun, W. (2011). Vocabulary learning strategies employed by undergraduate students and its relationship to their vocabulary knowledge. The 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science, 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, S. (2007). Vocabulary learning strategies of Korean university students: Strategy use, vocabulary size, and gender. English Teaching, 62(1), 149-169. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application and Interpretation (3rd edition). United States: Pyrczak Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  27. Munandar, K., Nurweni, A., & Mahpul, M. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size of the Indonesian senior high students. U-JET, 5(7), 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nacera, A. (2010). Languages learning strategies and the vocabulary size. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4021–4025. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nagy, W. E. (1997). On the role of context in first- and second- language vocabulary learning. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 64-83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nirattisai, S., & Chiramanee, T. (2014). Vocabulary learning strategies of Thai university students and its relationship to vocabulary size. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 273-287. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, Mass: Heinle ve Heinle. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pallant, J. (2016). Spss Kullanma Kılavuzu – Spss ile Adım Adım Veri Analizi. (S. Balcı & B. Ahi, Trans.) Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmitt, N. (2007). Current perspectives on vocabulary teaching and learning. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 827-841). Berlin: Springer US. [Google Scholar]
  37. Syed, S. A. (2014). Determination of vocabulary learning strategies of students of Turkish as a foreign language at Jamia Milia Islamia University (Unpublished master thesis). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale. [Google Scholar]
  38. Şener, S. (2003). The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size of Turkish EFL students (Unpublished master thesis). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale. [Google Scholar]
  39. Şener, S. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategy preferences and vocabulary size of pre-service English teachers. The International Journal of Educational Researchers. 6(3), 15-33. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tanyer, S., & Öztürk, Y. (2014). Pre-service English teachers’ vocabulary learning strategy use and vocabulary size: A cross-sectional evaluation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 37-45. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tok, M., & Yıgın, M. (2014). Türkçenin ikinci dil olarak öğretiminde öğrencilerin kullandıkları kelime öğrenme stratejileri. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 41, 265-276. [Google Scholar]
  42. Waldvogel, D. A. (2013). The relationships between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size among adult Spanish foreign language learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 209-219.  [Google Scholar]
  43. Wode, H. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Langauge Acquisition (21), 243-258. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2017). Spss Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 13 Issue 4

December 2018

All Articles

Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.