International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2023, Vol. 18(3) 197-222

Self-Regulated Learning Behaviors of Pre-School Teacher Candidates in Flipped Learning

Funda Ergüleç & Rahime Filiz Ağmaz

pp. 197 - 222   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2023.600.10   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2308-18-0005

Published online: September 30, 2023  |   Number of Views: 39  |  Number of Download: 152


Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine pre-school teacher candidates' self-regulated learning practices in a flipped learning environment and to explore the educational factors in flipped learning influencing pre-school teacher candidates’ self-regulation skills development process. This study examines how pre-school teacher candidates use self-regulation strategies during the implementation of flipped learning. This case study was carried in the fall semester of the 2022-2023 academic year with 55 first-year Early Childhood Education department teacher candidates. A structured interview form was used as a data collection tool and the data of the research is composed of pre-school teacher candidates answers to the interview form consisting of open-ended questions. The data were analyzed by thematic analysis method. The study would shed light on how the results may be used to flipped learning approaches for teaching and learning. 

Keywords: Self-Regulated Learning, Pre-School Teacher Candidates, Flipped Learning


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Ergulec, F. & Agmaz, R.F. (2023). Self-Regulated Learning Behaviors of Pre-School Teacher Candidates in Flipped Learning . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(3), 197-222. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2023.600.10

Harvard
Ergulec, F. and Agmaz, R. (2023). Self-Regulated Learning Behaviors of Pre-School Teacher Candidates in Flipped Learning . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 18(3), pp. 197-222.

Chicago 16th edition
Ergulec, Funda and Rahime Filiz Agmaz (2023). "Self-Regulated Learning Behaviors of Pre-School Teacher Candidates in Flipped Learning ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 18 (3):197-222. doi:10.29329/epasr.2023.600.10.

References
  1. Abdullah, M. Y., Hussin, S., & Ismail, K. (2019). Implementation of flipped classroom model and its effectiveness on English speaking performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(09), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i09.10348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Aksoy, R. N., & Türker, P. M. (2023). Examining the self-regulation characteristics of music teacher candidates in the online learning environment in terms of various variables. Art and Commentary. 0(41), 14-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sanatyorum/issue/76563/1274531 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvi, E., & Gillies, R. M. (2021). Self-regulated learning (SRL) perspectives and strategies of Australian primary school students: A qualitative exploration at different year levels. Educational Review, 75(4), 680–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1948390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Bakhtiar, A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2022). Motivation from a self-regulated learning perspective: Application to school psychology. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211054699 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education. [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, B.T. (2022). Self-regulated learning strategies used by students to prepare mathematics exams. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(4), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.459.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  9. Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June), The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2—22585. [Google Scholar]
  10. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0959-4752(96)00015-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation?. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Boström, L., & Lassen, L. M. (2006). Unraveling learning, learning styles, learning strategies and meta‐cognition. Education+Training, 48(2/3), 178 189.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910610651809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Bretzmann, J. (2013). Flipping 2.0: Practical strategies for flipping your class. Bretzmann Group. [Google Scholar]
  16. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, Ş., & Çakmak, E. K. (2022). Scientific research methods. Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 793-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7 [Google Scholar]
  18. Costa, A. L. (1984). Mediating the metacognitive. Educational Leadership, 42(3), 57- 62. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_198411_costa.pdf [Google Scholar]
  19. Demir, S. (2022). Implementation of technology-supported self-regulated strategy development model in the education of gifted and talented students. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.431.14  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  20. Eren, E., Ergulec, F., Gonulkirmaz, E., Gorgec, Z. Y., & Ikiz, E. (2023). Çevrimiçi ortamda öz düzenlemeli öğrenmeyi desteklemede öğretim uygulamaları. Toplum, Eğitim ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7881791. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Händel, M., Naujoks-Schober, N., & Dresel, M. (2023). Metacognitive monitoring via strategies and judgments. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 55(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Hannafin, M., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/83620/ [Google Scholar]
  23. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, S.-Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Inzlicht, M., Werner, K. M., Briskin, J. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2021). Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-061020-10572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. Jung, H., Park, S. W., Kim, H. S., & Park, J. (2021). The effects of the regulated learning-supported flipped classroom on student performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09284-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Karlen, Y., Hirt, C. N., Liska, A., & Stebner, F. (2021). Mindsets and self-concepts about self-regulated learning: Their relationships with emotions, strategy knowledge, and academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Khazai, A., Nili, M. R., Zavaraki, Z. E., & Delavar, A. (2023). The effect of instructional package based on flipped learning on students’ meta cognition and problem solving skills. The Journal of Psychological Science, 21(120), 2347–2364. https://doi.org/10.52547/jps.21.120.2347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an Urban University: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Kitchner, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Kostaris, C., Stylianos, S., Sampson, D. G., Giannakos, M., & Pelliccione, L. (2017). Investigating the potential of the flipped classroom model in K-12 ICT teaching and learning: An action research study. International Forum of Educational Technology and Society. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2018). Rethinking the flipped learning pre-class: Its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. Lim, C., Ab Jalil, H., Ma'rof, A., & Saad, W. (2020). Peer learning, self-regulated learning and academic achievement in blended learning courses: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(3), 110-125. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217022/. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lin, Y. T. (2021). Effects of flipped learning approaches on students’ learning performance in software engineering education. Sustainability, 13(17), 9849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  35. Nurdiyanti, N., & Wajdi, M. (2023). Flipped classroom assisted with schoology applications to support student metacognition skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 4977-4982. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Mahimuang, S. (2005). Factors influencing academic achievement and improvement: A value-added approach. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 4(1),13-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-005-0677-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  37. Merriam, S. B. (1985). The case study in educational research: A review of selected literature. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET). Revue De La Pensée Educative,19(3), 204–217. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23768608 [Google Scholar]
  38. Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., López Sánchez, J. Á., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in Higher Education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  39. Panduranga, S. N. & Kalapala, K.K. (2023). Metacognitive strategies in writing. The Seybold Report. 18(1), 299-315. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WZJN3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational And Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  41. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  42. Putri, R. R., Ahda, Y., & Rahmawati, D. (2018). Aspect analysis in higher order thinking skills on the evaluation instrument of protist topic for the grade 10 senior highschool students. BIODIK, 4(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v4i1.5504  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Robbins, M. M., Onodipe, G. O., & Marks, A. (2020). Reflective writing and self-regulated learning in multidisciplinary flipped classrooms. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i3.27541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  44. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L. & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14307/JFCS105.2.12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  46. Senemoğlu, N. (2005). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim: Kuramdan Uygulamaya. Gazi Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
  47. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  48. Susana, K. Y., & Brahma, W. A. A. (2021). The effectiveness of flipped learning during the pandemic to improve the writing competence of STMIK STIKOM Indonesia students. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 7(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.7.1.2883.75-84 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Temel, S. (2013). The effects of problem-based learning on self-regulated learning skills and the variables predictive of these skills. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 297. [Google Scholar]
  50. Turan, Z., & Goktas, Y. (2015). A new approach in higher education: The Students’ views on flipped classroom method. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 5(2), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  51. Urquiza-Fuentes, J. (2020). Increasing students’ responsibility and learning outcomes using partial flipped classroom in a language processors course. IEEE Access, 8, 211211-211223. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3039628 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  52. Vaughn, M.T. (2014). Teaching self-regulation skills to improve academic achievement. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 5(1), 1618–1625. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2014.0227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  53. Van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  54. van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 158, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  55. Wang, F. H. (2019). On the relationships between behaviors and achievement in technology-mediated flipped classrooms: A two-phase online behavioral PLS-SEM model. Computers & Education, 142, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103653 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  56. Wijaya, Z. R., & Sandi, S. (2020). The influence of motivation, discipline and self-confidence on student academic achievement in Management Study Program, Institut Manajemen Wiyata Indonesia. Cakrawala Repositori IMWI, 3(2), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.52851/cakrawala.v3i2.58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  57. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). Macmillan.  [Google Scholar]
  58. Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., & Jung, J. (2011). Self-regulation and learning strategies. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.443 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  59. Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2020). College students’ time management: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1319–1351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z [Google Scholar]
  60. Yarnall, L., Freed, M., & Malone, N. (2019). Self-regulated learning. Modernizing Learning: Building the future learning ecosystem, 285-297. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge, 3(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  62. Zarouk, M. Y., Olivera, E., Peres, P., & Khaldi, M. (2020). The impact of flipped project-based learning on self-regulation in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(17), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i17.14135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  63. Zeitlhofer, I., Hörmann, S., Mann, B., Hallinger, K., & Zumbach, J. (2023). Effects of cognitive and metacognitive prompts on learning performance in Digital Learning Environments. Knowledge, 3(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3020019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  64. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]