International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2021, Vol. 16(1) 7-20

Gender Roles, Personality Traits and Expectations of Women and Men Towards Marriage

Elif Ulu Ercan & Semra Uçar

pp. 7 - 20   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.334.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2010-18-0005.R1

Published online: March 24, 2021  |   Number of Views: 49  |  Number of Download: 250


Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine whether gender roles, self-esteem and personality predict the expectations of men and women’ attitudes about marriage. The sample of the study consists 491 people, 345 women, and 146 men. All cases are single and have college degrees. In this research, Gender Formation Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Attitudes About Romance and Mate Selection Scale, and Sociotropy-Autonomy Scale were used. In this study, the marriage expectations of women and men were evaluated by using the “Multiple Regression Analysis (Stepwise Method)” method. All variables are included in the analysis for both women and men. The results of the multiple regression analysis sociotropy, autonomy, and traditional gender roles variables were found to be significant predictors of the marriage expectations of women. As a result of the multiple regression analysis performed to predict the marriage expectations of men, it was seen that sociotropy variable was a significant predictor. According to the results, as the sociotropy scores of men increase the positive expectations towards marriage also increase. According to the findings, it was seen that the variables that predict the marriage expectations of women and men are different from each other.

Keywords: Gender Roles, Marriage Expectations, Sociotropy, Autonomy


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Ercan, E.U. & Ucar, S. (2021). Gender Roles, Personality Traits and Expectations of Women and Men Towards Marriage . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(1), 7-20. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2020.334.1

Harvard
Ercan, E. and Ucar, S. (2021). Gender Roles, Personality Traits and Expectations of Women and Men Towards Marriage . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(1), pp. 7-20.

Chicago 16th edition
Ercan, Elif Ulu and Semra Ucar (2021). "Gender Roles, Personality Traits and Expectations of Women and Men Towards Marriage ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 16 (1):7-20. doi:10.29329/epasr.2020.334.1.

References
  1. Acitelli, L. K., Rogers, S., & Knee, C. R. (1999). The role of identity in the link between relationship thinking and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(5), 591-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599165003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Alqashan, H., & Alkandari, H. (2010). Attitudes of Kuwaiti Young Adults toward Marriage and Divorce. Advances in Social Work, 11(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.18060/255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Sociological Review, 60 (1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Arıcı, F. (2011). Gender roles perceptions and psychological well-being of university students. Unpublished master’s thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Balık, T. (2017). Investigation of the relationship between stress management style and psychological symptoms of adults with sociotropic and autonomic personality traits. Unpublished master’s thesis. Işık University,İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  7. Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: new perspectives. In P. J. Clayton, & J. E. Barnett (Eds.), Treatment for depression: Old controversies and new approaches (pp. 265-290). New York: Raven Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Harrison R. P., & Emery, G. (1983). Development of the Sociotropy–Autonomy Scale: A measure of personality factors in psychopathology. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bianchi, S. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 705–725. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00726.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Bruce, M., Flora, R., & Stacey, C. (2004). Divorce as it influences the intimate relationships of college students. Journal for the Human Sciences, 3, 1-14. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bookwala, J., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Age, marital processes, and depressed affect. The Gerontologist, 44(3), 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/44.3.328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50(3), 164–168. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  13. Cobb, N. P., Larson, J. H., & Watson, W. L. (2003). Development of the attitudes about romance and mate selection scale. Family Relations, 52(3), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00222.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2004). Interactive effects of gender ideology and age at first marriage on women’s marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 25(5), 658-682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03257795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171-1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Doğan, H. (2010). The relationship between sociotrophic-autonomic personality traits of married couples and the conflicts in their marriages. Unpublished master’s thesis. Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  18. Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Epstein, M. (2008). Adolescents in conflict: Associations between gender socialization, gender conflict, and well-being. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan-Michigan. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gaunt, R. (2006). Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier? Journal of personality, 74(5), 1401-1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00414.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Faulkner, R. A., Davey, M., & Davey, A. (2005). Gender-related predictors of change in marital satisfaction and marital conflict. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 33(1), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180590889211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Hafner, R. J., & Spence, N. S. (1988). Marriage duration, marital adjustment and psychological symptoms: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(3), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198805)44:3<309::AID-JCLP2270440302>3.0.CO;2-W [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. Hiller, D. V., & Philliber, W. W. (1986). The division of labor in contemporary marriage: Expectations, perceptions, and performance. Social Problems, 33(3), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/800704 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Johnson, M. P. (1999). Personal, moral, and structural commitment to relationships: Experiences of choice and restraint. In J. M. Adams & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Handbook on interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 73-87). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.  [Google Scholar]
  25. Karairmak, Ö., & Siviş-Çetinkaya, R. (2011). The effects of self-esteem and locus of control on resilience: The mediating role of affects. Turkish Psychological Counseling & Guidance Journal, 4(35), 30-43. [Google Scholar]
  26. Karandashev, V. (2015). A cultural perspective on romantic love. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 5(4), 1-21. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Karasar, N. (2000). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. (10. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaufman, G. (2005). Gender role attitudes and college students’ work and family expectations. Gender Issues, 22(2), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-005-0015-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Kazemi-pour, S. (2009). The evaluation of youth attitudes toward marriage and understanding its consequences with emphasis on student marriages in universities. Journal of Culture of the Islamic of Azad University, 13(2), 75- 95. [Google Scholar]
  30. Korkmaz, M. (1996). Yetişkin örneklem için bir benlik saygısı ölçeğinin güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ege University, Institute of Social Sciences, İzmir, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nho, C. R., Kim, J. H., Shin, H. J., & Heo, S. H. (2017). Meta‐analysis of depression among marriage‐based migrant women in South Korea. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 11(3), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. Loscocco, K., & Spitze, G. (2007). Gender patterns in provider role attitudes and behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 28(7), 934-954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07300787 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. McBride, C., Bacchiochi, J. R., & Bagby, R. M. (2005). Gender differences in the manifestation of sociotropy and autonomy personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Mickelson, K. D., Claffey, S. T., & Williams, S. L. (2006). The moderating role of gender and gender role attitudes on the link between spousal support and marital quality. Sex Roles, 55(1-2), 73-82. DOI 10.1007/s11199-006-9061-8 [Google Scholar]
  35. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  36. Newman, J. L., Fuqua, D. R., Gray, E. A., & Choi, N. (2009). Sociotropy, autonomy, and masculinity/femininity: implications for vulnerability to depression. Psychological Reports, 104(2), 549- 557. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.104.2.549-557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  37. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review Psychology, 57(1), 401-421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  38. Özdemir, S.O. (2016) .A revision requirement in Turkish divorve law. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 35(1), 29-46 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pleck, J. H. (1975). Masculinity—Femininity. Sex Roles, 1(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Raeisei, A., Mojahed, A., & Bakhshani, N. M. (2015). The relationship between personality styles of sociotropy and autonomy with suicidal tendency in medical students. Global Journal of Health Science, 7(3), 345. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  41. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sato, T., & McCann, D. (1998). Individual differences in relatedness and individuality: An exploration of two constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(6), 847-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00020-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  43. Smiler, A. P., & Epstein, M. (2010). Measuring gender: Options and issues. In Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 133-157). Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  44. Savaşır I, Şahin N. (1997). Bilişsel davranışçı terapilerde değerlendirme: Sık kullanılan ölçekler. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları. İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  45. Spotts, E. L., Lichtenstein, P., Pedersen, N., Neiderhiser, J. M., Hansson, K., Cederblad, M., & Reiss, D. (2005). Personality and marital satisfaction: A behavioural genetic analysis. European Journal of Personality, 19(3), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  46. Şahin, N., Ulusoy, M., & Şahin, N. (1993). Exploring the sociotropy‐autonomy dimensions in a sample of Turkish psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(6), 751-763. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5, pp. 481-498). Boston, MA: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  48. Thompson, L. (1993). Conceptualizing gender in marriage: The case of marital care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(3), 557–569. doi:10.2307/353338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex roles, 36(5-6), 305-325.  [Google Scholar]
  50. Waller, M. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). “His” and “her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00005.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  51. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2001). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. Random House Digital, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  52. Whitton, S. W., & Whisman, M. A. (2010). Relationship satisfaction instability and depression. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(6), 791. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021734 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  53. Uçar, S. (2017). Romantic relationship experiences in emerging adulthood.  Unpublished doctoral thesis. İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  54. Xu, X., & Lai, S. C. (2004). Gender ideologies, marital roles, and marital quality in Taiwan. Journal of Family Issues, 25(3), 318-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03257709 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  55. Yılmaz, D. V., Zeyneloğlu, S., Kocaöz, S., Kısa, S., Taşkın, L., & Eroğlu, K. (2009). Views on gender roles of university students. Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1), 775-792. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zeigler-Hill, V., Britton, M., Holden, C. J., & Besser, A. (2015). How will I love you? Self-esteem instability moderates the association between self-esteem level and romantic love styles. Self and Identity, 14(1), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.960445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  57. Zheng, R. (2016). The relationships between confucian family values and attitudes toward divorce in mainland China: An exploratory study. Dissertations—All. 611.  Retrieved from https://surface.syr.edu/etd/611 [Google Scholar]