Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research
ISSN (Print): 1949-4270 - ISSN (Online): 1949-4289

Research article    |    Open Access
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2020, Vol. 15(4) 270-284

Scheduled Leadership Behaviors Scale for School Administrators: Validity and Reliability Study

Seda Şayan Kösem & Mustafa Aydın Başar

pp. 270 - 284   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.323.15

Publish Date: December 28, 2020  |   Single/Total View: 85/612   |   Single/Total Download: 121/1.070

PDF Download

Abstract

Scheduled leadership can be defined as empowering individuals with the exception of the team's top manager with ‘freedom of acting and decision making.' A wide range of measurement tools have been developed with the aim of measuring planned private leadership. In Turkey, the studies have begun to adapt it to our language and have continued to develop an appropriate scale for the Turkish management structure and operation. The planned leadership scales that have been developed in the field of education are not adequate and the relevant scale development studies are required. The main objective of this study is to re-approach the behavior of school administrators of planned leadership and to develop a scale within this framework. In Canakkale, a sample group, 360 individuals who were identified using a cluster sampling method were studied. SPPS 23.0 and AMOS 24.0 statistical packaged software were used for data analysis. Explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were calculated for the suitability of the data set for factor analysis, sample efficiency and validation studies; Cronbach Alpha internal consistency was calculated for the reliability studies. With the actions being carried out, the scale of 30 items is such that the 'School Manager's planned leadership behaviors' are presented. In conclusion, the scale developed has a four-factor structure, 'Development and Cooperation', 'Culture', 'Vision and Responsibility' and 'Chances and Opportunities' and is characterized by a high degree of validity and reliability.

Keywords: Scheduled leadership, developing a scale, school manager, validity, reliability

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Kosem, S.S., & Basar, M.A. (2020). Scheduled Leadership Behaviors Scale for School Administrators: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(4), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.323.15

Harvard
Kosem, S. and Basar, M. (2020). Scheduled Leadership Behaviors Scale for School Administrators: Validity and Reliability Study. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(4), pp. 270-284.

Chicago 16th edition
Kosem, Seda Sayan and Mustafa Aydin Basar (2020). "Scheduled Leadership Behaviors Scale for School Administrators: Validity and Reliability Study". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 15 (4):270-284. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.323.15

References
  1. Açıkalın, A. (1998). Toplumsal kurumsal ve teknik yönleriyle okul yöneticiliği, Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  2. Açıkgöz, Kemal. (1986). Demokrasi ve eğitimde demokrasi. Abece Aylık Eğitim Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi. Ankara: Maya Matbaacılık. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ağıroğlu-Bakır, A. (2013). Öğretmenlerin paylaşılan liderlik ve örgütsel bağlılık algıları arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. . [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Inonu University, Malatya. (Dissertation no: 333813). [Google Scholar]
  4. Aslan M. & Ağıroğlu Bakır, A. (2015). The interaction of distributed leadership and organizational commitment in schools: A qualitative study. Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science.1(2), 1-30. [Google Scholar]
  5. Balcı, A. (2000). İkibinli yıllarda Türk milli eğitiminin örgütlenmesi ve yönetimi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 24, 495-508. [Google Scholar]
  6. Balcı, A. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baloğlu, N. (2011). Dağıtımcı liderlik: Okullarda dikkate alınması gereken bir liderlik yaklaşımı. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 127-148. [Google Scholar]
  8. Beycioğlu, K. & Aslan, B. (2010). Öğretmen liderliği ölçeği: Geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 764-775. [Google Scholar]
  9. Beycioğlu, K ve Aslan, B. (2012).Öğretmen ve yöneticilerin öğretmen liderliğine ilişkin görüşleri: bir karma yöntem çalışması. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 18(2), 191-223. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2013). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bolden, R. (2004). What’s leadership?, Shoutwest of England. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bostancı-Bozkurt, A. (2012). Turkish adaptation of the shared leadership perception scale. Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 1619-1632. [Google Scholar]
  13. Carson, K., D., Carson, P. & Birkenmeier, B., J. (2000). Measuring emotional ıntellingence: Development and validation of an instrument. Journai of Applied and Behavioral Management. 2(1), 33-46. [Google Scholar]
  14. Canakkale Directorate of National Education. (2016). https://canakkale.meb.gov.tr/ viewed -06-15-2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal Bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik spss ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  16. Davis, M. W. (2009). Distributed leadership and school performance. . [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. George Washington University. [Google Scholar]
  17. DPT. (2004). İlçelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik sıralaması araştırması (2004). http:// www.kalkinma.gov.tr/ Lists/ Yaynlar/Attachments/299/ilce.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  18. D'Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J. E., & Kukenberger, M. R. (2016). A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership: Team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1964-1991. doi:10.1177/0149206314525205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute [Google Scholar]
  20. Erol, Y, C. (2016). Paylaşılan liderlik, aile katılımı ve okula bağlılık arasındaki ilişki. (Unpublished master's thesis). Fırat University, Institute of Education Sciences. Elazığ. (Dissertation no: 445657). [Google Scholar]
  21. Fullan, M. (2002). The change. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16-20. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gibb, C.A. (1954), Leadership, in Lindzey, G. (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.2, 877-917 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gordon, Z. V. (2005). The effect of distributed leadership on student achievement. Central Connecticut State University New Britain, Connecticut. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gümüşeli, A, İ. (2001). Çağdaş okul müdürünün liderlik alanları, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 28, 531-548. [Google Scholar]
  25. Güçlüol, K. (1985). Eğitim yönetiminde karar ve örnek olaylar. Ankara: Kadıoğlu Matbaası. [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation. 23(3), 313-324. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, G., C. (2012). Educational Administration, Theory, Research and Practice. 7th Ed.) (Translation editor: Selahattin Turan) Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hulpia, H., Devos, G. & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Article in School Effectiveness and School Improvement • January DOI: 10.1080/09243450902909840 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın. [Google Scholar]
  30. Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPPS 23 ve AMOS 23 uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. [Google Scholar]
  31. Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. [Google Scholar]
  32. Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (2001) Awakening the sleeping giant. helping teachers develop as leaders. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kılınç, A. Ç & Recepoğlu, E. (2013). Ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin öğretrmen liderliğine ilişkin algı ve beklentileri, Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi. 3 (2), 175-215. [Google Scholar]
  34. Meydan C. H. & Şeşen H. (2011) Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay. [Google Scholar]
  35. Özdemir, M. (2012). Dağıtımcı liderlik envanterinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 18(4), 575-598. [Google Scholar]
  36. Özer, N. & Beycioğlu, K. (2013). Paylaşılan liderlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. İlköğretim Online. 12(1), 77-86. [Google Scholar]
  37. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive Goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online. 8(2), pp. 23-74. [Google Scholar]
  38. Spillane, J. P. (2013). Managing instructional quality & leading instructional improvement: Engaging with the essence of school improvement. Australian Educational Leader. 37(1), 22–26. [Google Scholar]
  39. Şahin, M., Uğur, C., Dinçel, S. Balıkçı, A. & Karadağ, E. (2014). Dağıtımcı liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması, dil geçerliği ve ön psikometrik incelenmesi, Eğitimde Politika Analizi Dergisi. 3(2), s. 19-30. [Google Scholar]
  40. Taştan, M. & Oğuz, E. (2013). İlköğretim öğretmenleri için dağıtımcı liderlik ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 11, 103-124. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wood, M. S. (2005). Determinants of shared leadership in management teams. International Journal of Lea Studies, 1(1), 64-85. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 15 (4)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 15 Issue 4

December 2020

All Manuscript

Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research

Copyright © 2025 Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website were created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.