International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2020, Vol. 15(3) 359-371

Relationships between Power Distance, Organizational Commitment, and Trust in Schools

Tevfik Uzun

pp. 359 - 371   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.270.17   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2005-06-0004.R1

Published online: September 24, 2020  |   Number of Views: 171  |  Number of Download: 242


Abstract

Power distance is important for the healthy execution of relations, interactions, and communication between managers and employees. Low power distance improves the quality of relationships, interactions, and communication between school administrators and teachers, while high power distance decreases them. The power distance that teachers believe to exist in school may be related to their organizational attitude, value and behaviour. In this context, the aim of the study is to examine the relationships between teachers' power distance beliefs and their organizational commitment and organizational trust. Research data were collected in Giresun, Turkey in 2018. The study group of the research consists of teachers working in public high schools. According to the results of the research, teachers' power distance beliefs are at “low” level. There are positive correlations between teachers' power distance beliefs and their organizational commitment and organizational trust. Teachers' power distance beliefs predict their organizational commitment and organizational trust. The results of the research are thought to contribute to the awareness of the importance of power distance of school administrators in terms of manager-teacher interaction.

Keywords: Power Distance, Organizational Commitment, Trust


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Uzun, T. (2020). Relationships between Power Distance, Organizational Commitment, and Trust in Schools . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(3), 359-371. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2020.270.17

Harvard
Uzun, T. (2020). Relationships between Power Distance, Organizational Commitment, and Trust in Schools . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(3), pp. 359-371.

Chicago 16th edition
Uzun, Tevfik (2020). "Relationships between Power Distance, Organizational Commitment, and Trust in Schools ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 15 (3):359-371. doi:10.29329/epasr.2020.270.17.

References
  1. Akyol, Ş. (2009). Power distance and leadership relation in organizational culture. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  2. Börü, D., & İslamoğlu, G. (2005). Power distance, trust, organizational citizenship behavior. International Conference on Business, Economics, and Management, Yaşar University, İzmir, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  3. Çelebi, N., & Tatık, R. Ş. (2019). Prediction of level of job satisfaction of teachers on perception of organizational trust of teachers: Study of regression analysis. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(5), 2103-2114. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Daniels, M. A., & Greguras, G. J. (2014). Exploring the nature of power distance: Implications for micro-and macro-level theories, processes, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1202-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Demir, K. (2016). Relations between teachers’ organizational justice perceptions and organizational commitment and job satisfaction in the school: A meta analysis. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1408-1417. DOI: 10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3396 [Google Scholar]
  6. Demirtaş, D., & Güneş, H. (2002). Eğitim yönetimi ve denetimi sözlüğü [Educational administration and supervision dictionary]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  7. Din, M. S., Bashir, M., Cheema, K. U. R., & Zafar, S. S. (2014). The role of power distance in the relationship between employee motivation and organizational commitment: A study on education sector of Pakistan. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(1), 9-18. DOI: 10.9790/487X-16130918 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership in patterns. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127-150. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ersoy, E. (2019). The relationship between organizational power distance and organizational synergy level of teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). Istanbul Kültür University, İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  10. Farh, J., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 715-729. DOI: 10.2307/20159880 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fini, A. A. S., & Abmal, Y. (2017). Examine the relationship between organizational happiness and organizational spirituality with organizational commitment in administrators and teachers. Journal of Exploratory Studies in Law and Management, 4(2), 48-52. [Google Scholar]
  12.  Göl-Dede, D. (2019). The relationship between power distance perceptionsof teachers and their organizational silence. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gul, H., Usman, M., Liu, Y., Rehman, Z., & Jebran, K. (2018). Does the effect of power distance moderate the relation between person environment fit and job satisfaction leading to job performance? Evidence from Afghanistan and Pakistan. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Gül, Ö. (2019). The effect of power distance on leader member exchange in schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gürce, E. (2018). The moderating role of the power distance in the relationship between organizational politics perception and organizational trust. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hayat, A. A., Kohoulat, N., Kojuri, J., & Faraji, H. (2015). A study on the relationship between schools’ health and teachers’ organizational commitment. International Journal of School Health, 2(4), 5-11. [Google Scholar]
  17. Helvaci, M. A., & Kiliçoglu, A. (2018). The relationship between the organizational change cynicism and organizational commitment of teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(11), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i11a.3806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SagePublications. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SagePublications. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organiztaions: Software of the mind. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Jaworski, B. J., &  Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing. 57, 53-70. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kara, S. B. K., Güneş, D. Z., & Aydoğan, N. N. (2015). Perceived organizational support and organizational trust in primary schools. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 385-393. DOI: 10.14687/v12i2.3326 [Google Scholar]
  26. Khatri, N. (2009). Consequences of power distance orientation in organizations. The Journal of Business Perspective. 13(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/097226290901300101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 557-569. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individualpower distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders:A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43669971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Kocabıyık, M. (2017). The power distance and the effect of organizational justice that the school principals use to predict organizational independence of teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  30. Köylü, D., & Gündüz, Y. (2019). The level of participation of teachers in the decision-making process of the relationship between organizational commitment and psychological well being. Ufuk Unıversity Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8 (15), 279-299. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee, Y. T., & Antonakis, J. (2014). When preference is not satisfied but the individual is: How power distance moderates person–job fit. Journal of Management, 40(3), 641-675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  32. Önder, M. E., Akçıl, U., & Cemaloğlu, N. (2019). The relationship between teachers’ organizational commitment, job satisfaction and whistleblowing. Sustainability, 11(21), 59-95. DOI: 10.3390/su11215995 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ozdem, G. & Sezer, S. (2019). The relationship between solution-focused school leadership and organizational cynicism, organizational commitment and teachers' job satisfaction. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(1),167-183. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.184.11  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Polat, M. (2009). A field study on antecedents and consequences of organizational identification. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rafiei, S., & Pourreza, A. (2013). The moderating role of power distance on the relationship between employee participation and outcome variables. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 1(1), 79. DOI:  10.15171/IJHPM.2013.12 [Google Scholar]
  36. Seymen, O., & Korkmaz, E. (2017). The moderator effect of power distance on the relationship between organizational commitment and organizational silence. Social Sciences Studies Journal, 3(8), 509-529. [Google Scholar]
  37. Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., & Winograd, G. (2000). Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters. Organization Development Journal, 18(4), 35-48 [Google Scholar]
  38. Soyalın, M. (2019). The relations among organizational ethical climate, psychological safety, power distance orientation and employee voice behaviour. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  39. Şeşen, H. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of intrapreneurship: A study on Turkish defence industry. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Turkish Military Academy Defense Science Institute, Ankara, Turkey.  [Google Scholar]
  40. Tentama, F., & Pranungsari, D. (2016). The roles of teachers' work motivation and teachers' job satisfaction in the organizational commitment in extraordinary schools. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(1), 39-45. DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v5i1.4520 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ulus, A. B. (2018). A research for examinig the relationships between power distance and organizational justice perceptions of employees and political behaviors. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  42. Uslu, O., & Ardıç, K. (2013). Does power distance effect organizational trust?. Afyon Kocatepe University Journol of Economics and Adminisrative Sciences, 15(2), 313-338.  [Google Scholar]
  43. Uzun, T. & Kesicioglu, O.S. (2019). Analysis of the relation between organizational commitment and job satisfaction with the organizational happiness of preschool teachers. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 13(29), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2019.210.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  44. Uzun, T. (2018a). Relations between organizational support, organizational trust, affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior perceived at the school. International Journal of Society Researches, 8(15), 958-987. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.418335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Uzun, T. (2018b). Relationship among the perceived organizational support, organizational ıdentification and the turnover ıntention of teachers: mediating role of the organizational trust. The Black Sea Journal of Social Science, 10(18), 133-155. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilson, M. S., & Chaudhry, A. (2017). Can empowerment and organizational support for development stem turnover? It depends on power distance. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 4(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.15950abstract [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Yıldırım, B., & Denız, A. (2014). The relationship between power distance and organizational commitment in primary schools. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(19), 750-760. DOI: 10.5897/ERR2014.1869 [Google Scholar]
  48. Yüksel, S. (2016). Effects of primary teachers’ perceptions associated with individualist/collectivist organisation structure and power distance on self-efficiency beliefs. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zacharo, K., Marios, K., & Dimitra, P. (2018). Connection of teachers’ organizational commitment and transformational leadership. A case study from Greece. International Journal of Learning. Teaching and Educational Research, 17(8), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.8.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  50. Zeinabadi, H., & Salehi, K. (2011). Role of procedural justice, trust, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in organizational citizenship behavior (ocb) of teachers: Proposing a modified social exchange model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1472-1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]