International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2022, Vol. 17(1) 236-246

Principal Authorized Teacher as a Management Form

Zeki Öğdem

pp. 236 - 246   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2022.248.12   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2108-15-0001.R1

Published online: March 01, 2022  |   Number of Views: 64  |  Number of Download: 284


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the attitudes of teachers who are authorized as principals about the concept of “principal authorized teacher.” The snowball sampling method was used to enroll 40 principal authorized teachers for the study. They were requested to create metaphors for the concept of “principal authorized teacher” in the provided form to determine their mental thoughts and demographic data. Due to missing information and illegible writing in the gathered data, only 32 participants’ data were examined. The analysis revealed that the metaphors indicated by the principal authorized teachers were classified as overworked, competent, self-sacrificing, working beyond their job duties, and other conceptual categories, respectively. When the suggestions are examined, it is necessary to reduce the workload of the principal authorized teachers. Thus, the principal can do the work of authorized teachers more effectively.

Keywords: Principal authorized teacher, primary school, metaphor


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Ogdem, Z. (2022). Principal Authorized Teacher as a Management Form . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(1), 236-246. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2022.248.12

Harvard
Ogdem, Z. (2022). Principal Authorized Teacher as a Management Form . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 17(1), pp. 236-246.

Chicago 16th edition
Ogdem, Zeki (2022). "Principal Authorized Teacher as a Management Form ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 17 (1):236-246. doi:10.29329/epasr.2022.248.12.

References
  1. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  2. Döş, İ. (2010). Aday öğretmenlerin müfettişlik kavramına ilişkin metafor algıları [Metaphoric perceptions of candidate teacher to the concept of inspector]. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 607-629. [Google Scholar]
  3. Karayel, E. (2017). Birleştirilmiş sınıf uygulaması olan ilkokullarda görevli öğretmenlerin yaşadığı sorunlar [Teachers working in primary schools with unified classroom implementation problems experienced]. Uluslararası Liderlik Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 26-39. [Google Scholar]
  4. Keser Özmantar, Z., & Civelek, Ş. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenleri ve sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bakış açısıyla müdür yetkili öğretmenlik uygulaması [“Principal Authorized Teacher” practice from the perspectives of in- and pre-service primary teachers]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 323-347. [Google Scholar]
  5. Köse, M., & Demir, E. (2014). Öğretmenlerin rol modelliği hakkında öğrenci görüşleri [Students’ opinions about teachers' role model]. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 4(1), 8-18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kubanç, Y., & Şama, E. (2017). Müdür yetkili öğretmenlerin yaşadiklari sorunlara ilişkin görüşleri: Van ili örneği [Opinions of teachers’ authorized as principals on the problems they faced: The case of Van]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 268-285. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaforlar: Hayat, anlam ve dil [Metaphors: Life, meaning and language (Çev. G. Y. Demir). İstanbul: Paradigma. [Google Scholar]
  8. MEB (1999). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına Bağlı Okul ve Kurumların Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerinin Norm Kadrolarına İlişkin Yönetmelik [Regulation on the Norm Staff of Managers and Teachers of Schools and Institutions affiliated to the Ministry of National Education]. Retrieved from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/3.5.9913184.pdf on June 5, 2021.  [Google Scholar]
  9. Morgan, H. (1997). Cognitive styles and classroom learning. Westport, CT: Praeger.  [Google Scholar]
  10. Tosun, F. Ç., & Filiz, T. (2017). Müdür yetkili sınıf öğretmenlerinin karşılaştıkları ekonomik ve okul işletmesiyle ilgili sorunlar [Problems encountered by teachers working as an authorized principal related with economic and school management]. Elementary Education Online, 16(3), 978-991. [Google Scholar]
  11. Üstün, A., & Çam, E. (2016). Müdür yetkili öğretmenlerin liderlik stilleri ile okul müdürlerinin liderlik stillerinin karşılaştırılması [Comparing the leadership styles of administratorauthorised teachers and school administrators]. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(3), 63-73. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [SPSS applied scientific research methods]. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.  [Google Scholar]
  13. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods In Social Sciences] (11. edition). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık [Google Scholar]