Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research
ISSN (Print): 1949-4270 - ISSN (Online): 1949-4289

Research article    |    Open Access
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2021, Vol. 16(4) 73-89

The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Pre-Service Teachers' Digital Literacy and Digital Pedagogical Competencies

Serkan Aslan

pp. 73 - 89   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2021.383.4

Publish Date: December 02, 2021  |   Single/Total View: 129/598   |   Single/Total Download: 171/994

PDF Download

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the flipped classroom model on the pre-service social studies teachers' digital literacy and digital pedagogical competencies. The study employed one group pretest-posttest design, one of the weak experimental models. The working group of the study consisted of 28 sophomore studying at the department of social studies teaching in a Turkish state university during the 2019-2020 academic year. This study employed 'Digital Literacy and Digital Pedagogic Competency Scales' as data collection tools. Descriptive statistics and multivariate variance analysis (MANOVA) were used during data analysis. The study results revealed that the flipped classroom model based activities had a significant impact upon the digital literacy and digital pedagogical competences of the participants. The study also examined whether there was a significant difference in pre-service teachers' pre-test and post-test scores with regards to gender. A significant difference was identified across the pre-service teachers' digital literacy post-test scores in favor of females. Based on the results, various recommendations were provided.

Keywords: Digital Literacy, Digital Pedagogical Competence, Flipped Classroom Model, Pre-Service Teachers

How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Aslan, S. (2021). The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Pre-Service Teachers’ Digital Literacy and Digital Pedagogical Competencies. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(4), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2021.383.4

Harvard
Aslan, S. (2021). The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Pre-Service Teachers’ Digital Literacy and Digital Pedagogical Competencies. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(4), pp. 73-89.

Chicago 16th edition
Aslan, Serkan (2021). "The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Pre-Service Teachers’ Digital Literacy and Digital Pedagogical Competencies". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 16 (4):73-89. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2021.383.4

References
  1. Akbulut, Y. (2011). SPSS applications in social sciences. İdeal Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aslan, S. (2021). Flipped classroom model in Turkish teaching. S. Aslan & M. Müldür (Eds.) Contemporary approaches in turkish teaching with application examples. Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aslan, S. (2021). Analysis of digital literacy self-efficacy levels of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 4(1), 57-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Aslan, S., & Aybek, B. (2020). Examining the digital literacy levels of secondary school students in terms of various variables. VIIth International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, Eskişehir. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayçiçek, B. (2019). Flipped classroom model. In T. Yanpar-Yelken (Eds) Instructional technologies. Anı Yayincilik. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aydemir, E. (2019). The impact of flipped classroom approach on the reading and writing achievement, self-regulated learning, and classroom interaction of pre-service English teachers. Unpublished doctorate disseration. Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bayrakcı, S., & Narmanlıoğlu, H. (2021). Investigation of digital literacy levels of undergraduate students and graduates in Turkey. Academic Journal of Information Technology, 12(46), 46-67. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bayrakçeken, S., Doymuş, K., & Doğan, A. (2015). Cooperative learning model and its implementation. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Reach every student in every class every day. United States Of America: Flip Your Classroom. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bilge, B., & Kılcan, B. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin e-okuryazarlığa ilişkin tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies, 3(2), 114-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47503/jirss.795841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Bishop, J.L., & Verleger, M.A. (2013,). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boyacı, Z. (2019). The relationship between lifelong learning tendencies and digital literacy levels of pre-service teachers (A Düzce University sample). Unpublished master thesis. Sakarya University, Sakarya. [Google Scholar]
  13. Can, A. (2019). Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chilingaryan, K., & Zvereva, E. (2017). Methodology of flipped classroom as a learning technology in foreign language teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(21), 1500–1504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  16. Debbağ, M. (2019). The effectıiveness of the flipped classroom model designed for teaching principles and methods course curriculum. Unpublished doctorate disseration. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu. [Google Scholar]
  17. Demiralay, R., & Karataş, S. (2014). Flipped classroom model. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3(3), 333-340. [Google Scholar]
  18. Duman, İ. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom model incorporating activity-based learning on students’ academic achievement and learning motivation. Unpublished doctorate disseration. Sakarya University, Sakarya. [Google Scholar]
  19. Durmaz, Y. (2017). Investigating the relationship among primary teachers' efficasy of technopedagogical education, self-efficacy of teching and the level of technology use. Unpublished master thesis. Çanakkale 18 Mart University, Çanakkale. [Google Scholar]
  20. Elian, S. M., & Hamaidi, D. A. H. (2018). The effect of using flipped classroom strategy on the academic achievement of fourth grade students in Jordan. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2),110-125. [Google Scholar]
  21. Erbil, D.G. (2019). The effects of cooperative learning applied in flipped classroom on academic achievement and psychosocial variables. Unpublished doctorate disseration. Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir. [Google Scholar]
  22. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statics using SPSS. SAGE Pub. [Google Scholar]
  23. Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 356-366. [Google Scholar]
  24. Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H. (2014). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
  26. Göldağ, B. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri ile dijital veri güvenliği farkındalık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi . e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1 (3), 82-100 [Google Scholar]
  27. Green, S.B., & Salkind, N.J. (2013). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  28. Guo, S., Tian, Q., & Liu, Y. (2018). Study and pratice in flipped classroom based inquiry cooperative learning. 2017 7th International Conference on Education and Management (ICEM 2017 January). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gyeong-Geon, L., Young-Eun, J., & Hun-Gi, H. (2021) The effects of cooperative flipped learning on science achievement and motivation in high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1381-1407. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09500693.2021.1917788 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Hamutoğlu, N.B., Canan-Güngören, Ö., Kaya-Uyanık, G., & Gür-Erdoğan, D. (2017). Adapting digital literacy scale into Turkish. Journal of Education Aegean, 18(1), 408-429. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kabakçı, I., & Odabaşı, H.F. (2007). Professional development activity for computer teachers in their first working years. Uluslararası Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Sempozyumu (s.39-43). Baku: Azerbaycan. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu-Jie, H., Sheng-Quan, Y., & Shi-Deng, C. (2021). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance and interaction with a peer-coach strategy. Educational Studies, 47(3), 292-311. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ocak, G., & Karakuş, G. (2018a). An investigation of digital literacy self-efficacy skills of pre-service teachers in terms of different variables. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Science, 21(1), 129-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.466549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Ocak, G., & Karakuş, G. (2018b). Pre-service teachers’ digital literacy self-efficacy scale development. Journal of Kastamonu Education, 26(5), 1427-1436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  35. Özdemir, M., & Doğruöz, E. (2020). Scientific research patterns. N. Cemaloğlu (Eds). Scientific research techniques and ethics. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  36. Özdemir, M.Ç. (2019). The use of flipped classroom in geometry eaching investigation of the effect of the mathematics teacher candidates on the attitudes of geometry. Unpublished doctorate disseration. Bayburt University, Bayburt. [Google Scholar]
  37. Özkan, M. (2019). To whom / what will I go to solve the problem in educational research? S. Turan (Eds). Research methods in education. Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using spss for windows. Australian Copyright. [Google Scholar]
  39. Phoeun, M., & Sengsri, S. (2021). The effect of a flipped classroom with communicative language teaching approach on undergraduate students’ English speaking ability. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 1025-1042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14360a [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Prenksy, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Seçer, İ. (2015). Practical data analysis with SPSS and Lisrel: Analysis and reporting. Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sulak, S.E. (2019). Development of the digital literacy scale: validity and reliability study. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(31), 1329-1342. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.1345 [Google Scholar]
  43. Şahin, M.D. (2019). Causal comparison studies. S. Şen & İ. Yıldırım (Eds). Research methods in education. Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  44. Şata, M. (2020). Quantitative research approaches. E. Oğuz (Ed). Research methods in education. Eğiten Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? The Electronic Journal of e‐Learning, 14(1), 54‐65. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tuncer, M. (2020). Quantitative research approaches. B. Oral & A. Çoban (Eds). Scientific research methods in education from theory to practice. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tyger, R. (2011). Teacher candidates’ digital literacy and their technology integration efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Graduate Faculty of Georgia Southern University in Statesboro, Georgia. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yaman, H., Aydemir-İleri, Z., & Demirtaş, T. (2013). The Scale of Preservice Teachers’ Digital Pedagogic Competencies: Validity and Reliability Study. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 3(3), 26-35. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yaman, H., Demirtaş, T., & Aydemir, Z. (2013). The digital pedagogic competencies of pre-service turkish-language teachers. Turkish Studies, 8(8), 1407-1419. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.4665 [Google Scholar]
  51. Yazıcıoğlu, A., Yaylak, E., & Genç, G. (2020). Okulöncesi ve sınıf öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 274-286. [Google Scholar]
  52. YÖK. (2018). Öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programları. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi Müdürlüğü. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, L. (2018). English flipped classroom teaching model based on cooperative learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(6), 3652-3661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.6.278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
Meta
Vol. 16 (4)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 16 Issue 4

December 2021

All Manuscript

Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research

Copyright © 2025 Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY
All elements of this website were created using the BOQ™ - Intelligent Webverse System.