International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2021, Vol. 16(2) 366-381

The Analysis of the Relationship Between Internet Addiction and Loneliness in Science and Art Education Center (Bilsem) Students

Alev Orhan & Eda Gürlen

pp. 366 - 381   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.345.17   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2102-09-0003.R1

Published online: May 27, 2021  |   Number of Views: 30  |  Number of Download: 134


Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between internet addiction and loneliness levels of the gifted high school students studying at the Turkish Science and Education Center; the relationship analysis is carried out on the basis of different variables. As the goal is to present the current situation, descriptive survey model is preferred and used in the study. Internet addiction scale and UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Loneliness Scale are used as data collection tools. Unrelated groups t-test is used while analyzing the obtained data to determine if there is a meaningful difference between internet addiction and the variables. Kruskal Wallis H test and Mann Whitney-U test are preferred to see if there is a meaningful difference between the UCLA loneliness scale and the variables. At the end of the research process, it is found that the gifted high school students studying at the Science and Art Education Center didn’t have internet addiction; however, according to the findings, they experience a high level of loneliness. Finally, according to the findings of the research study, the variables of gender, daily internet use period, and parents’ education level didn’t cause any meaningful difference in the internet addiction level and in the loneliness state of the gifted students.

Keywords: The Gifted, Internet Addiction, Loneliness


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Orhan, A. & Gurlen, E. (2021). The Analysis of the Relationship Between Internet Addiction and Loneliness in Science and Art Education Center (Bilsem) Students . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(2), 366-381. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2020.345.17

Harvard
Orhan, A. and Gurlen, E. (2021). The Analysis of the Relationship Between Internet Addiction and Loneliness in Science and Art Education Center (Bilsem) Students . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(2), pp. 366-381.

Chicago 16th edition
Orhan, Alev and Eda Gurlen (2021). "The Analysis of the Relationship Between Internet Addiction and Loneliness in Science and Art Education Center (Bilsem) Students ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 16 (2):366-381. doi:10.29329/epasr.2020.345.17.

References
  1. Atwood-Blainea, D., Rulea, A. C., & Walkerb, J. (2019). Creative self-efficacy of children aged 9-14 in a science center using a situated Mobile game. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Bayraktar, F. (2001). The role of internet use in adolescent development (Unpublished master's thesis). Ege University Institute of Social Sciences, İzmir. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayraktar, F.,& Gün Z. (2007). Incidence and correlates of internet usage among adolescents in north cyprus, Cyberpsychology and Behavior, (10), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9969 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Bayram, S.,B., & Gündoğmuş, G. (2016). Investigation of primary school students' internet addiction tendencies and loneliness levels according to various variables, Academic View Journal, 54, 307-318. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bozkurt, H., Şahin, S., & Zoroğlu, S. (2016). Internet addiction: a current review. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 6(3), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.16899/ctd.66303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Bursal, M. (2017). Basic data analysis with SPSS. Ankara: Anı Publishing [Google Scholar]
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Scientific research methods (5th Edition). Ankara: PegemA Publishing [Google Scholar]
  8. Demir, A. (1989). Validity and reliability of UCLA loneliness scale. Journal of Psychology, 7-23. [Google Scholar]
  9. Derin, S., & Bilge, F. (2016). Internet addiction and subjective well-being in adolescents. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 6(46), 35-51. [Google Scholar]
  10. Doğan, A. (2013). Internet addiction prevalence (Unpublished master's thesis). Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir. [Google Scholar]
  11. Durak-Batıgün, A., & Hasta, A. (2010). Internet addiction: an evaluation in terms of loneliness and interpersonal relationship styles. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 17(798), 213-217. [Google Scholar]
  12. Erbaş, Y. H. (2020). Erken çocukluk döneminde dijital bağımlılık. In R.F. Ağmaz & F. Ergüleç (Eds.), Erken çocukluk eğitiminde dijital teknoloji ve öğrenme (ss.93-107). Pegem A. Yayıncılık. DOI: 10.14527/ 9786257228671. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fariz, S., & Sarıcı-Bulut, S. (2019). Investigation of internet addiction among high school students in terms of various variables. Kastamonu Education Journal. 27 (5), 1978-1990. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Gürlen, E. (2018). Gifted children and educational practices. Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  15. Karasar, N. (2018). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel Publishing [Google Scholar]
  16. Karasu, F., Bayır, B., & Çam, H.,H. (2017). Examining the relationship between university students' internet addiction and social support. Journal of Social Sciences, 7(14), 374-388. https://doi.org/10.31834/kilissbd.345142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Kelemen, G. (2020). Gifted children education in early childhood- practical strategies. Journal Plus Education, 25(1), 165-170. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ko, C-H., Yen, J-Y., Yen, C.-F., Lin, H.-C., & Yang, M.-J., (2007) Factors predictive for incidence and remission of internet addiction in young adolescents: a prospective study. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(4), 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9992. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Manap, A. & Durmuş, E. (2021). Investigation of digital parenting awareness in terms of various variables, family roles and internet addiction in the child, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 141-156.  [Google Scholar]
  20. MEB. (2006). T.C. Ministry of National Education, directive of science and art centers. Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  21. Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329902300102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Sevgili-Koçak, S. (2019). Examining the opinions of gifted children on digital games. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 6(2), 87-102. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2011). Exemplified scientific research methods. Ankara: Anı Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  24. TÜİK (2019). Household information technology usage research. Accessed on 17 June 2019 from http://tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=30574. [Google Scholar]
  25. Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., Chan, F. K., Thong, J. Y., & Hu, P. J. H. (2019). Children’s Internet addiction, family-to-work conflict, and job outcomes: A study of parent-child dyads. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 903–927. [Google Scholar]
  26. Webb, J.T., Gore, J.L., Amend, E.R.,& DeVries, A.R. (2016). Gifted children: a handbook for experts and families (Trans. B. Uyaroğlu, B.Bülbün Aktı). Ankara: Anı Publishing. (Original publication date, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  27. Widyanto, L., & Mcmurran, M. (2004). The psychometric properties of internet addiction test. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7, 443-450. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Yavuz, O. (2018). Investigation of perceived social support levels with internet and game addiction in gifted students. Life Skills Journal of Psychology, 2(4), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.475080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yıldız, A. (2017). Ethical sensitivity in the virtual world as a facilitating factor for Internet addiction, Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 9(4), 398-409. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.310777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Young, K.(2017) The evolution of ınternet addiction disorder. [Adobe Digital Editions]. The access address is Ebook Library. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46276-9_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]