The Effect of the Use of Discussion Types on the Listening Skills of Convicts / Prisoners in Training-Improvement Activities Applied in Criminal Execution Institutions

Bahadır Ahmet Atila & Fulya Topçuoğlu Ünal

doi:https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.323.5

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2020, Vol. 15(4) 86-106

The Effect of the Use of Discussion Types on the Listening Skills of Convicts / Prisoners in Training-Improvement Activities Applied in Criminal Execution Institutions

Bahadır Ahmet Atila & Fulya Topçuoğlu Ünal

pp. 86 - 106 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.323.5 | Manu. Number: MANU-2007-06-0003.R1

Published online: December 28, 2020 | Number of Views: 94 | Number of Download: 578

Save PDF

Abstract

Training and rehabilitation activities for convicts and detainees are of utmost importance for a state’s national policy in terms of their targeted lives after release. The purpose of this study is to put forward whether socio-cultural activities such as debate, panel, forum, open session used in education and training activities for the rehabilitation works performed for prisoners are effective in practice or not and making detections on the issue that activities related with improving the listening skills of prisoners can be improved or not. This research was carried out with 122 volunteer participants selected with random method from convicts/detainees in penal institutions of Bursa province who graduated from primary school, secondary school, high school and university. The study has been analyzed by five different achievements tests which have been designed by the researcher to measure the ability to understand the listening comprehension success and it has been analyzed with a statistical analysis software. The study reveals that with the use of discussion types the success of convicts/prisoners in listening comprehension has showed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test.

Keywords: Penal execution institutions, Skills of listening, Convictions, Types of discussion

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Atila, B.A. & Unal, F.T. (2020). The Effect of the Use of Discussion Types on the Listening Skills of Convicts / Prisoners in Training-Improvement Activities Applied in Criminal Execution Institutions . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(4), 86-106. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2020.323.5

Harvard
Atila, B. and Unal, F. (2020). The Effect of the Use of Discussion Types on the Listening Skills of Convicts / Prisoners in Training-Improvement Activities Applied in Criminal Execution Institutions . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(4), pp. 86-106.

Chicago 16th edition
Atila, Bahadir Ahmet and Fulya Topcuoglu Unal (2020). "The Effect of the Use of Discussion Types on the Listening Skills of Convicts / Prisoners in Training-Improvement Activities Applied in Criminal Execution Institutions ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 15 (4):86-106. doi:10.29329/epasr.2020.323.5.

References

Ağcakale, S. (2010). Ceza mimarlığı. (Yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Yıldırım, E. & Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2001). Sosyal bilimlerde araştirma yöntemleri spss uygulamali. Adapazarı: Sakarya Kitabevi. [Google Scholar]
Aytan, T. (2011). Aktif öğrenme tekniklerinin dinleme becerisi üzerindeki etkileri (Doctora tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya. [Google Scholar]
Bademci, V. (2011). Kuder-Richardson 20, Cronbach’in alfasi, Hoyt’un varyans analizi, genellenirlik kurami ve ölçüm güvenirliği üzerine bir çalışma. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 173-193. [Google Scholar]
Behan, Cormac. (2014). Learning to Escape: Prison Education, Rehabilitation and the Potential for Transformation. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry. 1. 20. 10.15845/jper.v1i1.594. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284466922_Learning_to_Escape_Prison_Education_Rehabilitation_and_the_Potential_for_Transformation.http://dx.doi.org/10.15845/jper.v1i1.594 [Google Scholar]
Crabbe, M. (2016). Education for Offenders in Prison. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310449365_Education_for_Offenders_in_Prison [Google Scholar]
Doğan, Y. (2010). Dinleme becerisini geliştirmede etkinliklerden yararlanma. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 27, 263-274. [Google Scholar]
Epçaçan, C. (2013). Temel bir dil becerisi olarak dinleme ve dinleme eğitimi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(11), 331-352. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.483 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
Karaatlı, M. (2010). Verilerin düzenlenmesi ve gösterimi. Kalaycı, Ş. (Ed.) SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (s. 3-42). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım. [Google Scholar]
Rodley, N. & Pollard, M. (2009). The treatment of prisoners under international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Smit, D.V.ZYL. & Snacken, S. (2009). Principles of european prison law and policy penology and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-85. pp. 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Tekin, E. (2000). Karşılaştırmalı tek denekli araştirma modelleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 2(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Urgan, G. (2020). Positive obligations of states for the protection of prisoners’ rights under the case law of the european court of human rights. İstanbul: Eğitim Yayınevi. [Google Scholar]
Welch, M. (2005). Ironies of imprisonment. California: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-006-9008-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
White, R & Haines F. (2004). Crime and criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]

Volume 15 Issue 4

December 2020

All Articles