International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research
International Association of Educators

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2020, Vol. 15(3) 33-55

Opinions of Secondary School Students with Interactive Social Studies Notebooks (ISSN) on Values Development

Erhan Yaylak

pp. 33 - 55   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.270.2   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2004-16-0005.R1

Published online: September 24, 2020  |   Number of Views: 103  |  Number of Download: 720

Save PDF

Abstract

With the aim of investigating the values gained by using interactive notebook applications in social studies lessons for secondary school students, this study was completed as a case study from the qualitative research pattern including 21 students attending a state secondary school in İzmir province during the 2017-2018 educational year and using interactive social studies notebooks. The 21 students selected with the simple random sampling method underwent individual, face-to-face semi-structured interviews. The obtained data was analyzed with the MAXQDA 12 program for content analysis. The following conclusions were reached based on the obtained findings; during ISSN activities students helped each other more compared to normal educational activities and they conceptualized and developed the importance of helping. When students helped each other they felt happy, good, loved and that their friendships were strengthened. They developed their sense of sharing when everyone did the activity together and shared the material they needed. With sharing values, the students began to trust each other and developed a sense of trust. The value of responsibility also developed, though not as much as the other values. Students participating in the research enjoyed doing activities together and expression of this situation can be said to show they developed esthetic feelings. Within the framework of ISSN activities, students generally had positive criticism of the activities performed with friends, but some students had negative criticism. Students performing ISSN activities attempted to leave their surroundings or working area clean at the end of lessons. Students who forgot to clean were warned by other students.

Keywords: Interactive Notebooks, Social Studies, Values Education, Secondary School Students

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Yaylak, E. (2020). Opinions of Secondary School Students with Interactive Social Studies Notebooks (ISSN) on Values Development . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(3), 33-55. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2020.270.2

Harvard
Yaylak, E. (2020). Opinions of Secondary School Students with Interactive Social Studies Notebooks (ISSN) on Values Development . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(3), pp. 33-55.

Chicago 16th edition
Yaylak, Erhan (2020). "Opinions of Secondary School Students with Interactive Social Studies Notebooks (ISSN) on Values Development ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 15 (3):33-55. doi:10.29329/epasr.2020.270.2.
References
  1. Akbaş, O. (2004). Türk milli eğitim sisteminin duyuşsal amaçlarının ilköğretim II.kademede gerçekleşme derecesinin değerlendirilmesi. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Gazi University, Ankara. (Dissertation no: 190366). [Google Scholar]
  2. Aktepe, V. (2014). Etkinlik temelli değer eğitiminin öğrencilerin yardımseverlik tutumlarına etkisi. Researcher: Social Science Studies, 2(3), 17-49. DOI: 10.18301/rss.13 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aladağ, E., Gündüz, H. İ. & Parlayan Ö. (2016). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin hoşgörü eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi: Antakya örneği. Eğitimde Gelecek Arayışları: Dünden Bugüne Türkiye’de Beceri, Ahlak ve Değerler Eğitimi Sempozyum Kitabı, Cilt I. 1357-1372. Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aslan, R. (2007). Öğretmen görüşlerine göre ilköğretim birinci basamaktaki öğrencilerin temel bilgi, beceri ve değerler kazanma düzeyleri. [Unpublished master’s dissertation], Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. (Dissertation no: 210086). [Google Scholar]
  5. Aspin, D. (2000). A clarification of some key terms in values discussions. In M. Leicester, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Vol. 4. Moral education and pluralism: Education, culture, and values (pp. 171e180). London: Farmer Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aydın, M. Z. (2010). Values education at school. Overview of Education: Journal of Education and Science Research, 6(18), 16-19. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brock, L. L., Nishida, T. K., Chiong, C., Grimm, K. J. & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2008). Children’s perceptions of the classroom environment and social and academic performance: A longitudinal analysis of the contribution of the Responsive Classroom approach. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 129–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, United States: SAGE Publications Inc. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. (6th ed.). New York, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar]
  10. Çelikkaya, T. & Seyhan, O. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin ve öğretmen adaylarının evrensel değerlere ilişkin metafor algıları. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(3), 65-87, DOI: 10.19160/ijer.342330 [Google Scholar]
  11. Çengelci, T. (2010). A case study regarding values education in the fifth grade social studies course in primary education. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Anadolu University, Eskişehir. (Dissertation no: 258126). [Google Scholar]
  12. Çengelci Köse, T. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde değerler eğitimi. Şimşek, S. (Ed.) Sosyal bilgiler ve sınıf öğretmenleri için sosyal bilgiler öğretimi içinde, 347-371. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  13. Çengelci Köse, T. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde değerler eğitimi. In Şimşek, S. (Ed.) Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi, 347-371. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ergen, G. (2019). Value Literacy – A New Model for Education of Character and Values. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 14(2), 45-75. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2019.201.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Eryaman, M. Y. (2007). Examining the characteristics of literacy practices in a technology-rich sixth grade classroom. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET) 6(2), 26-41. [Google Scholar]
  16. Genc, S. Z., & Eryaman, M. Y. (2008). Değişen Değerler ve Yeni Eğitim Paradigması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9 (1), 89-102. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gürkaynak, İ. (1995). Farklı boyutları ile hoşgörü. Hoşgörü ve Eğitim Toplantısı, Ankara: A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi yayını. [Google Scholar]
  18. Halstead, J. M. & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Learning and teaching about values: A review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169–202. DOI: 10.1080/713657146 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoge, J. D.  (2002) Character education, citizenship education, and the social studies. The Social Studies, 93(3), 103-108. DOI: 10.1080/00377990209599891 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hossain, A. & Marinova, D. (2004). Values education: A foundation for sustainability. In seeking educational excellence. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 9-10 February, Perth: Murdoch University. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jack, M. (2018, February 19).  Striking findings from founder of Alibaba.com Jack Ma. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9d3QdhOKkQ  [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson, R. B. & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. (Demir, S. B. Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, T. M. (2009). Framing the framework: discourses in Australia's national values education policy. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 8, 35-57. DOI: 10.1007 / s10671-008-9058-x [Google Scholar]
  24. Kan, Ç. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi ve değerler eğitimi. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 187, 138-145.  [Google Scholar]
  25. Kılcan, B. & Akbaba, B. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler öğretim programinda yer alan dayanişma değerine ilişkin öğrenci algilarinin incelenmesi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 22(1), 185-210. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kropp, E. H. (2006). The effects of a cognitive-moral development program on inmates in a correctional educational environment. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Virginia University, USA.  [Google Scholar]
  27. Lovat, T., Toomey, R., & Clement, N. (Eds.). (2010). International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing. London: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  28. Marcarelli, K. (2010). Teaching science with interactive notebooks. California: Corwin (A SAGE Company). [Google Scholar]
  29. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (2016). Nitel veri analizi (S. Akbaba Akgül & A. Ersoy, Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mutlu, H. H. & Dinç, S. (2019). 6. sınıf Türkçe ders kitabında yer alan temalardaki metinlerin kök değerlerle ilişkisi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(4), 1048-1062. DOI: 10.16916/aded.593400 [Google Scholar]
  31. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar]
  32. Öztürk, C. (2009). Sosyal bilgiler: Toplumsal yaşama disiplinlerarası bir bakış. In C. Öztürk (Ed.). Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi, 1-31. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  33. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. (Bütün, M. & Demir, S. B. Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  34. Paykoç, F. (2007). Affective development education and values: the turkish case. In N. Terzis, Education and values in the balkan countries (pp. 89-104). Thessaloniki: Publishing House Kyriakidis Brothers s.a. [Google Scholar]
  35. Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.  [Google Scholar]
  36. Schwartz, S., Melech, H., Lehmann, G., Burgess, A., Haris, M. & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542. DOI: 10.1177/0022022101032005001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sezer, T. (2008). İlköğretim 6. sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersinde sorumluluk değerinin öğretimine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. [Unpublished master’s dissertation], Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara. (Dissertation no: 218929). [Google Scholar]
  38. Tabak, S. & Yaylak, E. (2020). The place of root values in social studies textbook. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 8, 1-51. DOI: 10.35826/ijoecc.58 [Google Scholar]
  39. Thornberg, R. (2008). The lack of professional knowledge in values education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1791-1798. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tok, M., & Bostanoğlu, O. (2016). Hoşgörü değerinin kazandırılmasıyla var olan önyargıların azaltılması. Eğitimde Gelecek Arayışları: Dünden Bugüne Türkiye’de Beceri, Ahlak ve Değerler Eğitimi Sempozyum Kitabı, Cilt I. 1357-1372. Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tuncel, G. (2018). Alternative environmental applications in developing "sensitivity to natural environment" value in social studies. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education, 38, 91-103.  [Google Scholar]
  42. Türk Dil Kurumu. (2020, Şubat 24). Değer. https://sozluk.gov.tr/  [Google Scholar]
  43. Ulusoy, K., & Arslan, A. (2016). “Value and values education” as a valuable concept. In Turan, R. & Ulusoy, K. (Ed.). Values education with different aspects, 1-16. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ulusoy, K. & Dilmaç, B. (2018). Değerler Eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  45. Uyanık Balat, G., Özdemir Beceren, B. & Adak Özdemir, A. (2011). The evaluation of parents’ views related to helping pre-school children gain some universal values. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 908-912. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.210 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ünal, F., Er, H. & Gürel, D. (2016). Hoşgörü değerine yönelik etkinliğin geliştirilmesi ve değerlendirilmesi. Eğitimde Gelecek Arayışları: Dünden Bugüne Türkiye’de Beceri, Ahlak ve Değerler Eğitimi Sempozyum Kitabı, Cilt I. 1357-1372. Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yakar, P. & Yakar, A. (2016). İstasyon tekniğine dayalı değerler eğitimi uygulaması: Hoşgörü istasyonları. Eğitimde Gelecek Arayışları: Dünden Bugüne Türkiye’de Beceri, Ahlak ve Değerler Eğitimi Sempozyum Kitabı, Cilt I, 1399-1414. Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yazıcı, K. (2006). Değerler eğitimine genel bir bakış. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 19, 499-522. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yüksel, İ. & Adıgüzel, A. (2012). Değer Eğitiminde Karikatür Kullanımı: Toplumsal Birlik Beraberlik ve Dayanışma Değer Örneği. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(3), 68-80. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 15 Issue 3

September 2020

All Articles

Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.