International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research
International Association of Educators

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2018, Vol. 13(3) 6-23

Understanding Democratic and Distributed Leadership: How Democratic Leadership of School Principals Related to Distributed Leadership in Schools?

Derya Kılıçoğlu

pp. 6 - 23   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.150.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1807-09-0001.R1

Published online: September 29, 2018  |   Number of Views: 1067  |  Number of Download: 1310

Save PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine democratic and distributed leadership perceptions of teachers in their school and to explore the relationship between democratic and distributed leadership. This study intended to enrich and expand scholarly reflections on democratic and distributed leadership as regards considering the association between them, thereby deepening our understanding of leadership. Correlational research design was used as a research design in the study. Study population included teachers working at high schools in Eskisehir district in Turkey. Stratified sampling was used as a sampling method. The study sample included 462 teachers working at high schools. Descriptive statistics for democratic leadership suggested that respondent teachers perceive democratic leadership in their school in moderate level. Support and supervision were perceived as distributed leadership functions of the leadership team in schools. Regarding the leadership team characteristics, it was concluded that leadership teams are moderately perceived as coherent. The study results also revealed that there is a strong relationship between democratic leadership, distribution of leadership functions and coherent leadership team characteristics.

Keywords: democratic leadership, distributed leadership, school principals

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kilicoglu, D. (2018). Understanding Democratic and Distributed Leadership: How Democratic Leadership of School Principals Related to Distributed Leadership in Schools?. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(3), 6-23. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2018.150.1

Harvard
Kilicoglu, D. (2018). Understanding Democratic and Distributed Leadership: How Democratic Leadership of School Principals Related to Distributed Leadership in Schools?. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(3), pp. 6-23.

Chicago 16th edition
Kilicoglu, Derya (2018). "Understanding Democratic and Distributed Leadership: How Democratic Leadership of School Principals Related to Distributed Leadership in Schools?". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 13 (3):6-23. doi:10.29329/epasr.2018.150.1.
References
  1. Adeyemi, T. O., & Adu, E. T. (2013). Head teachers’ leadership styles’ and teachers job satisfaction in primary schools in Ekiti State, Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(2), 69-79. [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Momani, M., & Ajlouni, M. H. (2018). The practice degree of democratic behaviors of male and female principals at the public basic schools in their task performance in Bani Obeid District, from the standpoints of their teachers. Review of European Studies, 10(3), 12-27. doi: 10.5539/res.v10n3p12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Avissar,I., Alkaher, I., & Gan,  D. (2017). The role of distributed leadership in mainstreaming environmental sustainability into campus life in an Israeli teaching college: A case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-07-2017-0105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Baloğlu, N. (2011). Dağıtımcı liderlik: Okullarda dikkate alınması gereken bir liderlik yaklaşımı [Distributed leadership: A leadership approach that should be taken into account in the schools]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 127-148. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, L., Bolam, R., and Cubillo, L. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of school leadership and management on student outcomes. In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.(Available at http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk) [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., & Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed leadership (Full Report). Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhatti, N., Maitlo, G. M., Shaikh, N., Hashmi, M. A., & Shaikh, F. M. (2012). The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job satisfaction. International Business Research, 5(2), 192-201. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v5n2p192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Blasé, J., & J. Blasé. (2002). The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 6-44. doi: 10.1177/0013161X02381002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  9. Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (1997). The fire is back? Principals sharing school governance. Thousand Oaks, CA. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Blasé, J., Blasé, J., Anderson, G., & Dungan, S. (1995). Democratic principals in action. Thousand Oaks, CA. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bolden, R. (2004). What is leadership? Leadership South West Research Report. (Available at www.leadershipsouthwest.com) [Google Scholar]
  12. Bozdoğan, K., & Sağnak, M. (2011). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin liderlik davranışları ile öğrenme iklimi arasındaki ilişki  [The relationship between primary school principals’ leadership behaviors and learning climate]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 137-145. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2003). School leadership: Concepts and evidence (Full Report). Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chrispeels, J., Castillo, S., & Brown, J. (2000). School leadership teams: A process model of team development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(1), 20-56. [Google Scholar]
  15. Court, M. (2003). Different approaches to sharing school leadership (Full Report). Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  16. Currie, G., Lockett, A., & Suhomlinova, O. (2009). The institutionalization of distributed leadership: a ‘Catch-22’ in English public services. Human Relations, 62, 1735-1761. [Google Scholar]
  17. Day, C, Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., et al. (2009). The impact of school, leadership on pupil outcomes: Final report (Research Report No. DCSF-RR108). London: Department for Children, Schools and Families. [Google Scholar]
  18. Delgado, M. L. (2014). Democratic leadership in middle schools of Chihuahua Mexico: Improving middle schools through democracy. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 4(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ereş, F., & Akyürek, M. İ. (2016). İlköğretim müdürlerinin dağıtılmış liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin iş doyumu algıları arasındaki ilişki düzeyi [Relationship between distributed leadership behaviors of principals and the teachers’ perception of job satisfaction]. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(3), 427-449. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2010). Democratic educational leadership in comtemporary times. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 6(2), 119-136. doi: 10.1080/13603120304819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Gastil, J. (1994). A definition and illustration of democratic leadership. Human Relations, 47, 954-971. [Google Scholar]
  22. Goleman, D. (2002). The new leaders: Transforming the art of leadership into science of results. London: Little, Brown. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gosling, J., Bolden, R. and Petrov, G. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: what does it accomplish? Leadership, 5, 299-310. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653-696). Boston, MA/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  25. Grubb, W. N., & Flessa, J. J. (2006). A job too big for one: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(4), 518-550. doi: 10.1177/0013161X06290641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. Gunter, H. (2001). Leaders and leadership in education. London: Chapman. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gunter, H., Hall, D., & Bragg, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: A study in knowledge production. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 555-580. doi: 10.1177/1741143213488586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 329-351. [Google Scholar]
  29. Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership and school improvement. In A. Harris, C. Day, D. Hopkins, M. Hadfield, A. Hargreaves & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement. London: Routledge Falmer. [Google Scholar]
  30. Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32, 11-24. [Google Scholar]
  31. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  32. Harris, A. (2011). Distributed leadership: Implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 7-17. doi: 10.1108/02621711211190961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2002). Democratic leadership for school improvement in challenging contexts. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(9). ISSN 1206-9620  (Available at https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/75099/1/75099.pdf) [Google Scholar]
  34. Harris, A., D. Muijs, & M. Crawford. (2003). Deputy and assistant heads: Building leadership potential (Full Report). Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  35. Harris, A., Day, C., Hopkins, D., Hadfield, M., Hargreaves, A., & Chapman, C. (2003). Effective leadership for school improvement. London: Routledge Falmer. [Google Scholar]
  36. Harris, A., Moos, L., Møller, J., Robertson, J., & Spillane J. (2007). Challenging leadership practice: Exploring different perspectives and approaches to the practice of school leadership. National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hartley, D. (2007). The emergence of distributed leadership in education: Why now? British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 202-214.doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00371.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  38. Heller, M. E, & W. A. Firestone. (1995). Who's in charge here? Sources of leadership for change in eight schools. Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 65-86. [Google Scholar]
  39. Holtz, R. (2004). Group cohesion, attitude projection, and opinion certainty: Beyond interaction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8(2), 112-125. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.  [Google Scholar]
  42. Hu, L., & Bentler., P. M.  (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35(2), 153-171. doi: 10.1080/03055690802648739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  44. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 1013-1034. doi: 10.1177/0013164409344490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Jöreskog, K. G., & D. Sörbom. 2001. LISREL 8.51. Mooresvile: Scientific Software. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kensler, L. A. W. (2010). Designing democratic community for social justice. International Journal of Urban Educational Leadership, 4(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  47. Klinker, J. (2006). Qualities of democracy: Links to democratic leadership. Journal of Thought, 41(2), 51-63. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuczmarski, S. S., & Kuczmarski, T. D. (1995). Values-based leadership. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lakomski, G. (2005). Managing without leadership. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lashway, L. (2003). Distributed leadership. In Clearing house on Educational Management (CEPM). College of Education, University of Oregon, Research Roundup 19, 4. [Google Scholar]
  51. Leithwood, K., B. Mascall, T. Strauss, R. Sacks, N. Memon, & A. Yashkina. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 37-67. [Google Scholar]
  52. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  53. Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. St. Paul: University of Minnesota. [Google Scholar]
  54. MacCallum, R. C., Michael, W. B., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.  [Google Scholar]
  55. Mbera, P. G. A. (2015). Relationship between leadership styles used by head teachers of public secondary schools and students’ academic performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(7), 226-239. [Google Scholar]
  56. McClain, L., Ylimaki, R., & Ford, M. P. (2010). Wisdom and compassion in democratic leadership: Perceptions of the Bodhisattva ideal. Journal of School Leadership, 20(3), 323-351. [Google Scholar]
  57. Møller, J. (2003). Democratic leadership in an age of managerial accountability. Improving Schools, 5(1), 11-21. [Google Scholar]
  58. Northouse, P. G. (2011). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  59. Oduro, G. K. T. (September, 2004). ‘Distributed leadership’ in schools: What English headteachers say about the ‘pull’ and ‘push’ factors. Paper presented at the the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Manchester. [Google Scholar]
  60. Özdemir, M. (2012). Dağıtımcı liderlik envanterinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları [Turkish adaptation of distributed leadership ınventory: The validity and reliability studies]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 575-598. [Google Scholar]
  61. Riley, K. (2003). ‘Democratic leadership’- A contradiction in terms? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(2), 125-139. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rustin, M., & Armstrong, D. (2012). What happened to democratic leadership. Soundings, 50, 59-71. doi: 10.3898/136266212800379482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  63. Saadi, A. M., Hussain, A., Bhutta, R. N., Perveen, N., Kazmi, U., & Ahmad, N. (2009). Democratic and distributed leadership for school improvement: Case studies from Pakistan. The International Journal of Learning, 16(2), 521-532. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sanders, M. G. (2006). Missteps in team leadership. The experiences of six novice teachers in three urban middle schools. Urban Education, 41(3), 277-304. doi: 1177/0042085906287903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  65. Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2002). Leadership and school results. In K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger, K.Seashore-Louis, G. Furman-Brown, P. Gronn, W. Mulford & K. Riley (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration. Dordrecht: Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  66. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Eucational Forum, 69(2), 143-150. doi: 10.1080/00131720508984678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  67. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: John Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  68. Spillane, J. P., & Camburn, E. (2006, April). The practice of leading and managing: The distribution of responsibility for leadership and management in the schoolhouse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. [Google Scholar]
  69. Spillane, J. P., & Sherer, J. Z. (2004). A distributed perspective on school leadership: Leadership practice as stretched over people and place. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Education Association. San Diego: CA. [Google Scholar]
  70. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28. [Google Scholar]
  71. Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22(1), 73-91. doi: 10.1080/13632430220143042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  72. Starratt, R. (2001). Democratic leadership theory in late modernity: An oxymoron or ironic possibility? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(4), 333-352. [Google Scholar]
  73. Storey, A. (2004). The problem of distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership and Management, 24(3), 249-265. [Google Scholar]
  74. Terzi, A. R., & Derin, R. (2016). Relation between democratic leadership and organizational cynicism. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 193-204. [Google Scholar]
  75. Torrance, D. (2013). Distributed leadership: Still in the gift of the headteacher. Scottish Educational Review, 45(2), 50-63. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wai-Yan Wan, S., Hau-Fai Law, E. & Chan, K. K. (2017). Teachers’ perception of distributed leadership in Hong Kong primary schools. School Leadership & Management. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2017.1371689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  77. White, R. K., & Lippitt, R. O. (1960). Autocracy and democracy: An experimental inquiry. New York: Harper & Brothers. [Google Scholar]
  78. Williams, C. G. (2011). Distributed leadership in South African schools: Possibilities and constraints. South African Journal of Education, 31(2), 190-200. [Google Scholar]
  79. Woods, P. A. (2004). Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(1), 3-26. doi: 10.1080/1360312032000154522 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  80. Woods, P. A. (2005). Democratic leadership in education. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  81. Woods, P. A. (2011). Transforming educational policy: Shaping a democratic future. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. [Google Scholar]
  82. Woods, P. A., Bennett. N., Harvey, J. A., & Wise, C. (2004). Variabilities and dualities in distributed leadership: Findings from a systematic literature review, Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 32(4), 439-457. [Google Scholar]
  83. Yılmaz, D., & Turan, S. (2015). Dağıtılmış liderliğin okullardaki görünümü: Bir yapısal eşitlik modelleme çalışması [Distributed leadership view in schools: A structural equation modelling study]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 21(1), 93-126. doi: 10.14527/kuey.2015.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  84. Yörük, S., & Kocabaş, İ. (2001). Eğitimde demokratik liderlik ve iletişim [Democratic leadership and communication in education]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 225-234. [Google Scholar]
  85. Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Prentice Hall: New Jersey. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 13 Issue 3

September 2018

All Articles

Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.