International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2018, Vol. 13(3) 24-44

The Effect of Motivational Language on School Culture and Work-Related Quality of Life in Turkish School Settings

Hamit Ozen & Remzi Yıldırım

pp. 24 - 44   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.150.2   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1806-20-0003.R1

Published online: September 29, 2018  |   Number of Views: 156  |  Number of Download: 729


Abstract

The relationship between motivational language, school culture and work-related life quality was researched by structural equation modeling (SEM) in this study. The population of the research was composed of 378 school teachers teaching at different schools of in Manisa province of Turkey. The volunteer teachers were selected using convenience sampling method. A qualitative design of correlational research model was employed. The correlations among the variables, and the research questions were tested employing SEM. We offered three models. The first model was not verified but the second and the third models were verified according to the data obtained from the survey. As a result of the research, the motivational language (ML) did not have a correlation with school culture (SC) and work-related life quality (WRQoL) in model 1. WRQoL did not show a correlation with ML but it had a relationship with SC in the model 2. SC showed a good correlation with work-related life quality but it did not show a relation with ML in model 3.

Keywords: Motivational language, school culture, work-related life quality, school principal, structural equation model.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Ozen, H. & Yildirim, R. (2018). The Effect of Motivational Language on School Culture and Work-Related Quality of Life in Turkish School Settings. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(3), 24-44. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2018.150.2

Harvard
Ozen, H. and Yildirim, R. (2018). The Effect of Motivational Language on School Culture and Work-Related Quality of Life in Turkish School Settings. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(3), pp. 24-44.

Chicago 16th edition
Ozen, Hamit and Remzi Yildirim (2018). "The Effect of Motivational Language on School Culture and Work-Related Quality of Life in Turkish School Settings". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 13 (3):24-44. doi:10.29329/epasr.2018.150.2.

References
  1. Akar, H. & Ustuner, M. (2017). Turkish adaptation of work-related quality of life scale: validity and reliability studies, Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(2), 159-176. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.302675 [Google Scholar]
  2. Austen, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (1991). Images of leadership. Occasional Paper No. 7. Cambridge, MA: The National Center for Educational Leadership. [Google Scholar]
  5. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso [Google Scholar]
  6. Chelte, A. F. (1983). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and quality of worklife. U.M.I. Dissertation information service [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, N. (2000). Understanding individual and collective capacity to enhance quality of life. Health Education and Behavior, 6(21), 699-707. [Google Scholar]
  8. Deal, T. & Kennedy, A. (1984). Corporate cultures: the rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  9. Deal, T. E. & Peterson, K. D. (1990). The principal's role in shaping school culture. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. [Google Scholar]
  10. Eisenberg, N. (2006). Prosocial behavior. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children's needs III: development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 313-324). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fayers, P. & Machin, D. (2000). In quality of life: assessment, analysis, and interpretation. New York: John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  13. Green, S. B., Salkind, N. J., & Akey, T. M. (1997). Using SPSS for windows: analyzing and understanding data. NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldschmidt, N. (1987). A comparison of an ideal and a real quality of work life program (Order No. 1332026). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (303638243). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 303638243?accountid=16716 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999).  Cutoff Criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.  [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson, R. B. & Christensen, L. B. (2004). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnston, J. (1985). Four climates of effective middle level schools. Schools in the Middle, 3(4), 98-106. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnston, J. (1987). Values, culture, and the effective school. NASSP Bulletin. 71(467), 97-103. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.  [Google Scholar]
  22. Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: a replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451-479.  [Google Scholar]
  23. Lubkin, I. (1986). Chronic illness: impact and interventions. Boston: Jones and Bartlett. [Google Scholar]
  24. Markman, L. B. (2002). The impact of school culture on adolescents' prosocial motivation. ETD Collection for Fordham University. Retrieved from https://fordham.bepress.com/ dissertations /AAI3037223 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mayfield, J. & Mayfield, M. (2006), The benefits of leader communication on part-time worker outcomes: a comparison between part-time and full-time employees using motivating language. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(2), 131-153.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2008). The effects of leader motivating language use on worker decision making. Baltimore, MD: Decision Science Institute. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2009). The role of leader motivating language in employee absenteeism. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 455-479. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mayfield, J. & Mayfield, M. (2010). Leader-level influence on motivation language. Competitiveness Review, 20(5), 407-422. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mayfield, J. R., Mayfield, M. R., & Kopf, J. (1995). Motivating language: Exploring theory with scale development. The Journal of Business Communication, 32(4), 329-345.  [Google Scholar]
  30. Mayfield, J. R., Mayfield, M. R., & Kopf, J. (1998). The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 37(3-4), 235-248. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mert, İ. S., Keskin, N. & Bas, T. (2011). Motivasyonel dil (MD) teorisi ve ölçme aracının Türkçe’de geçerlik ve güvenilirlik analizi [The relaibility and validity analyses of motivational language theory and scale]. Dogus Universitesi Dergisi [Journal of University of Dogus], 12 (2), 243-255. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mills, T. (1984). The sociology of small groups. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nanjundeswaraswamy, T.S. & Swamy,  D. R. (2013). Quality of worklife of employees in private technical institution. International Journal for Quality Research. 7 (3), 3–14.  [Google Scholar]
  34. Ozen, H. (2013). Okul müdürlerine yönelik motivasyonel dil ölçeği: Türk kültürüne uyarlama, dil geçerliği ve faktör yapısının incelenmesi [Motivational language scale for school principals: Adaptation for Turkish culture, language validity, and examination of factor structure]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi [Journal of Educational Science Research], 3(1), 87–103.  [Google Scholar]
  35. Ozmen, F. & Muratoglu, V. (2010). The competency levels of school principals in implementing knowledge management strategies The views of principals and teachers according to gender variable. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5370-5376. [Google Scholar]
  36. Parkin, S., Johnston, A., Buckland, H., Brookes, F., & White, E. (2004). Learning and skills for sustainable development developing a sustainability literate society: guidance for higher education. Available from www.forumforthefuture.org/sites/ default/ files / project /downloads/learningandskills.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  37. Patrick, D. L. & Erickson P. (1988). What constitutes quality of life? concepts and dimensions. Clinical Nutrition, 7, 53-63. [Google Scholar]
  38. Peterson, D. K. (2002). Deviant workplace behavior and the organizaton’s ethical climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17 (1), 47-61. [Google Scholar]
  39. Power, F. C., Higgins, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). Lawrence Kohlberg's approach to moral education. New York: Columbia University Press.  [Google Scholar]
  40. Schein, E. (1965). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  41. Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schneider, S. (2011). Language of thought: A New Philosophical Direction, MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  43. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sullivan, J. J. (1988). Three roles of language in motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 104-113. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.  [Google Scholar]
  46. Terzi, A. R. (2005). Ilkogretim okullarinda orgut kulturu [Organizational culture in primary schools]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi [Educational management: Theory&Practice], 11(43), 423–441. [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Beck, S. A. (2011). The importance of the relationships between teachers and school principals (Order No. 3462926). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (879637026). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/ 879637026?accountid=16716 [Google Scholar]
  48. Vygotsky, L. (1965). Thought and language. USA, MA: MIT. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wagner, C. & Madsen-Copas, P. (2002). An audit of the culture starts with two handy tools. Journal of Staff Development, Summer, 42-54.  [Google Scholar]
  50. Walton, R. E. (1973). Quality of working life: What is it? Sloan Management Rewiev, 15(1), 11-21. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D., F., & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8 (1), 84-136. [Google Scholar]
  52. Witziers, B., Bosker R. J. & Krüger M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: the elusive search for an association, Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398-425. [Google Scholar]
  53. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2001). Constitution of the World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wren, D. J. (1999). School culture: exploring the hidden curriculum. Adolescence, 35, 593–596. [Google Scholar]