- Aguado-López, E., Becerril-García, A., & Godínez-Larios, S. (2018). Become associated or perish: functional collaboration within the social sciences in Latin America, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 161, 3-22. Doi: 10.5477/cis/reis.161.3 [Google Scholar]
- Alasuutari, P. (2004). The globalization of qualitative research. In: Seale, C.C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J.F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.). Qualitative research practice (595–608). London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Alise, M.A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4(2), 103-126. Doi: 10.1177/1558689809360805 [Google Scholar]
- Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 149, 803-831. Doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3 [Google Scholar]
- Bradley, J., Devarakonda, S., Davey, A., et al. (2020). Co-citations in context: Disciplinary heterogeneity is relevant. Quantitative Science Studies 1(1), 264–276. Doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00007 [Google Scholar]
- Broadus, R.N. (1987). Toward a definition of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 373-379. Doi: 10.1007/BF02016680 [Google Scholar]
- Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research—the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. Doi: 10.1007/BF02019280 [Google Scholar]
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory in global perspective: Reviews by international researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1074–1084. Doi: 10.1177/1077800414545235 [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns inscientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. Doi: 10.1002/asi.20317 [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z. (2016). Challenges and strategies of teaching qualitative research in China. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(2), 72–82. Doi: 10.1177/1077800415617209 [Google Scholar]
- Chenail, R.J., George, S.S., Wulff, D., & Laughlin, M. (2007). Mentoring qualitative research authors globally: The qualitative report experience. The Qualitative Report, 12(1), 67-81. Doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1644 [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Cobo, M.J., Lopez Herrera, A.G., Herrera Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: review, analysis and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 62(7), 1382-1402. Doi: 10.1002/asi.21525 [Google Scholar]
- Coser, L.A. (1971). Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2018). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., 1-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Diodato, V.P., & Gellatly, P. (2013). Dictionary of bibliometrics. New York Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Dubrow, J.K., Kołczyńska, M., Slomczynski, K.M., & Tomescu-Dubrow, I. (2018). Sociologists Everywhere: Country Representation in Conferences Hosted by the International Sociological Association, 1990–2012. Current Sociology, (66)3, 337–55. Doi: 10.1177/0011392115590612 [Google Scholar]
- Erickson, F. (2011). A history of qualitative inquiry in social and educational research. In: Denzin, N.K., & Guba, L. (Eds.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th Ed., 43-59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Estrada, S.M. (2016). Exploring tensions in knowledge networks: Convergences and divergences from social capital, actor-network theory and sociologies of the South. Current Sociology Review, 65(6), 886 –908. Doi: 10.1177/0011392116676298 [Google Scholar]
- Falagas, M.E., Pitsouni, E.I., Malietzis, G.A., et al. (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22, 338-342. Doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF [Google Scholar]
- Flick, U., & Röhnsch, R. (2014). Migrating diseases— Triangulating approaches: Applying qualitative inquiry as a global endeavor. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 1096-1109. Doi: 10.1177/1077800414543694 [Google Scholar]
- Flick, U. (2014). Qualitative inquiry—2.0 at 20? developments, trends, and challenges for the politics of research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 599 –608. Doi: 10.1177/1077800415583296 [Google Scholar]
- Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman. [Google Scholar]
- Gobo, G. (2011). Glocalizing methodology? The encounter between local methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 417–437. Doi: 10.1080/13645579.2011.611379 [Google Scholar]
- Guba, E., Lynham, S.A., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In: Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., 108–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Hsiung, P.C. (2015). Doing (critical) qualitative research in China in a global era. International Sociology, 30, 86–102. Doi: 10.1177/0268580914555934 [Google Scholar]
- Hsiung, P.C. (2012). The globalization of qualitative research: Challenging Anglo-American domination and local hege-monic discourse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research ,13(1). Doi: 10.17169/fqs-13.1.1710 [Google Scholar]
- Kawabata, M., & Gastaldo, D. (2015). The less said, the better: interpreting silence in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4), 1–9. Doi: 10.1177/1609406915618123 [Google Scholar]
- Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentations, 14(1), 10–25. Doi: 10.1002/asi.5090140103 [Google Scholar]
- Jokić, M., Mateljan, S. & Petrović, N. (2017). Are the social sciences from the European post-socialist countries integrated in the "Western social sciences"? 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 16-20 October, Wuhan, China. [Google Scholar]
- Loseke, D.R. & Cahill, S.E. (2007). Publishing qualitative manuscripts: Lessons learned. In: Seale, C.C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J.F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (491-506). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Mosbah-Natanson, S. & Gingras,Y. (2014). The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009). Current Sociology, 62(5), 626 –646. Doi: 10.1177/0011392113498866 [Google Scholar]
- Persson, O., Danell, R., & Wiborg Schneider, J. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In: Åström, F., Danell, R., Larsen, B., et al. (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday (Vol. 5, pp. 9–24). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, A.L., Kongthon, A., & Lu, J.C. (2002). Research profiling: Improving the literature review. Scientometrics, 53(3), 351-370. Doi: 10.1023/A:1014873029258 [Google Scholar]
- Reay, T. (2014). Publishing qualitative research. Family Business Review, 27(2), 95-102. Doi: 10.1177/0894486514529209 [Google Scholar]
- Ross, A.A. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2012). Prevalence of mixed methods research in mathematics education. Mathematics Educator, 22(1), 84-113. [Google Scholar]
- Römkens, R. (1997). Prevalence of wife abuse in the Netherlands: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in survey research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(1), 99-125. Doi: 10.1177/088626097012001007 [Google Scholar]
- Seale, C.C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J.F., & Silverman, D. (2004). Introduction: Inside qualitative research. In: Seale, C.C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J.F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 1–13). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication. [Google Scholar]
- Small, H. (1973). Co–citation in scientific literature: New measure of relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. Doi: 10.1002/asi.4630240406 [Google Scholar]
- Smith, M.L. (1987). Publishing qualitative research. American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 173-183. Doi: 10.3102/00028312024002173 [Google Scholar]
- Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press. [Google Scholar]
- Tracy, S.J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. Doi: 10.1177/1077800410383121 [Google Scholar]
- Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. Doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [Google Scholar]
- Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053–1070. Doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 [Google Scholar]
- Weaver, D. (2011). Neither too scientific nor a spy:negotiating the ethnographic ınterview in russia dorothy. Comparative Sociology, 10, 145–157. Doi: 10.1163/156913310X493069 [Google Scholar]
- Zilber, T.B. (2015). Turning a disadvantage into a resource: Working at the periphery. European Management Journal, 33(6), 423-430. Doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.002 [Google Scholar]
- Zukoski, A.P., & Thorburn, S. (2009). Experiences of stigma and discrimination among adults living with HIV in a low HIV-prevalence context: a qualitative analysis. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 23(4), 267-276. Doi: 10.1089/apc.2008.0168 [Google Scholar]
|