International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research
International Association of Educators

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2020, Vol. 15(1) 63-72

The Role of Moral Attitude, Goal Commitment, and Cheating Tendency in Academic Achievement

Ender Şenel, Mevlüt Yıldız & Süleyman Can

pp. 63 - 72   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.236.4   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2001-16-0001

Published online: March 24, 2020  |   Number of Views: 264  |  Number of Download: 778

Save PDF

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effects of cheating tendency, academic goal commitment, and moral attitude toward cheating on academic achievements of teacher candidates. 486 teacher candidates were recruited. The moral attitude toward cheating was measured with the Moral Attitude subscale of the Scale for Attitude Towards Cheating. The cheating tendency was measured with the Cheating subscale of the Academic Dishonesty Scale. The academic goal commitment was measured with the KUT scale. Academic achievement was measured with the GPA. The data were analyzed with the independent t-test, Pearson Correlation test, and path analysis. While moral attitude positively and directly affected academic goal commitment, it negatively and directly influenced cheating tendency negatively. Academic goal commitment predicted cheating tendency negatively and GPA positively. The cheating tendency had a negative impact on GPA. Academic goal commitment positively affected GPA via cheating tendency; however, the direct effect of academic goal commitment on GPA was higher than the indirect effect. Moral attitude negatively predicted cheating tendency via academic goal commitment while it affected GPA positively. Moral attitude positively predicted GPA via cheating tendency. Consequently, cheating tendency affected academic achievement negatively. Moral attitude toward cheating and the high level of academic goal commitment reduced cheating tendency and increased academic achievement.

 

Keywords: Moral, cheating, academic dishonesty

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Senel, E., Yildiz, M. & Can, S. (2020). The Role of Moral Attitude, Goal Commitment, and Cheating Tendency in Academic Achievement . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), 63-72. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2020.236.4

Harvard
Senel, E., Yildiz, M. and Can, S. (2020). The Role of Moral Attitude, Goal Commitment, and Cheating Tendency in Academic Achievement . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), pp. 63-72.

Chicago 16th edition
Senel, Ender, Mevlut Yildiz and Suleyman Can (2020). "The Role of Moral Attitude, Goal Commitment, and Cheating Tendency in Academic Achievement ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 15 (1):63-72. doi:10.29329/epasr.2020.236.4.
References
  1. Ay, M. F., & Çakmak, A. (2015). Kopya Çekmeye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi, 43, 140-155. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  3. Biggs, J. (1999). What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57-75. [Google Scholar]
  4. Biggs, J. B. (1987). The Learning Process Questionnaire (LPQ): Manual. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourassa, M. J. (2011). Academic dishonesty: Behaviors and attitudes of students at church-related colleges and universities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Toledo. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chase, A. J. E. (2010). Academic dishonesty in online courses: The influence of students' characteristics, perception of connectedness, and deterrents. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Florida Atlantic University. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cochran, J. K. (2017). The effects of life domains, constraints, and motivations on academic dishonesty: A partial test and extension of Agnew’s general theory. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 61(11), 1288-1308. [Google Scholar]
  8. Coleman, L.D. (2008). Experiences of African American students in a predominantly white, two-year nursing program. The ABNF Journal, 19, 8-13. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dapremont, J. A. (2011). Success in nursing school: Black nursing students’ perception of peers, family, and faculty. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(5), 254-260.  [Google Scholar]
  10. Dapremont, J. A. (2014). Black nursing students: Strategies for academic success. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(3), 157-161. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eminoğlu, E., & Nartgün, Z. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik sahtekarlık eğilimlerinin ölçülmesine yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 215-240. [Google Scholar]
  12. Entwistle, N. J., & Waterston, S. (1985). Approaches to studying and levels of processing: A comparison of inventories derived from contrasting theoretical bases. In International Conference on Cognitive Processes in Student Learning, Lancaster University, England. Also, British J. of Educational Psychology. [Google Scholar]
  13. Etowa, J. B., Foster, S., Vukic, A. R., Wittstock, L., & Youden, S. (2005). Recruitment and retention of minority students: Diversity in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 2(1), 1-12.  [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardner, J. D. (2005). A successful minority retention project. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(12), 566-568. [Google Scholar]
  15. Genereux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36, 687–704.  [Google Scholar]
  16. Girardi, J. (2011). A Phenomenological Study of Hispanic Female Associate Degree Graduates and the Interrelation Between Goal Commitment and Social, Institutional, and Cognitive Factors That Lead to Academic Success. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. School of Education [Google Scholar]
  17. Higgins, B. (2005). Strategies for lowering attrition rates and raising NCLEXRN pass rates. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(12), 541-547. [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, S. R. (2007). What works: Factors influencing community college Hispanic female academic achievement and persistence to graduation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas At Austin. [Google Scholar]
  19. Juklová, K., Doležalová, J., Vrabcová, D., & Nowosad, I. (2015). Learning and Reading Strategies of Future Teachers in International Comparison. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek. [Google Scholar]
  20.  Klein, H. J., Cooper, J. T., Molloy, J. C., & Swanson, J. A. (2014). The assessment of commitment: Advantages of a unidimensional, target-free approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 222-238. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lord, V. B., Bjerregaard, B., & Hartman, J. L. (2013). Evaluating the graduation gap: Interventions designed to enhance upper-level student success and commitment. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), 153-174. [Google Scholar]
  22. Love, K.L. (2010). The lived experience of socialization among African American nursing students in a predominantly White university. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21, 342-350. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British journal of educational psychology, 46(1), 4-11. [Google Scholar]
  24. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379-396. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mustaine, E., & Tewksbury, R. (2005). Southern college students’ cheating behaviors: An examination of problem behavior correlates. Deviant Behavior, 26, 439–461. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ömür, Y. E., Aydın, R., & Argon, T. (2014). Olumsuz değerlendirilme korkusu ve akademik sahtekârlık. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi, 5(9), 131-149. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ramsden, P. (1988). Context and strategy. In Schmeck, R. R. (Ed.) Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 159-184). Springer, Boston, MA. [Google Scholar]
  28. Robinson, E., Amburgey, R., Swank, E., & Faulkner, C. (2004). Test cheating in a rural college: Studying the importance of individual and situational factors. College Student Journal, 38(3), 380-396. [Google Scholar]
  29. Şenel, E., Yıldız, M., & Klein, H.J. (2019). Klein ve arkadaşlarının tek boyutlu hedeften bağımsız bağlılık ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. 2. Dünya Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Kongresi, 21-24 Mart 2019, Manisa/Türkiye [Google Scholar]
  30. Wong, S. T., Seago, J. A., Keane, D., & Grumbach, K. (2008). College students’ perceptions of their experiences: What do minority students think? Journal of Nursing Education, 47(4), 190-195. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yıldız, M., Şenel, E., & Can, S. (2018) The study approaches as the predictors of academic self-efficacy and teacher efficacy: A study in pedagogical formation students. Int J Sport Exer & Train Sci, - IJSETS, 4(3), 84-97. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, Y., Yin, H., & Zheng, L. (2018). Investigating academic dishonesty among Chinese undergraduate students: does gender matter?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 812-826. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 15 Issue 1

March 2020

All Articles

Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.