International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289

Original article | Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2019, Vol. 14(3) 268-289

To be a branch manager in a local educational directorate: Occupational problems and solutions

Ahmet Bozak, Yavuz Bolat & Bahri Karabulut

pp. 268 - 289   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2019.208.12   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1906-11-0002

Published online: September 29, 2019  |   Number of Views: 112  |  Number of Download: 754


Abstract

This study examines the occupational problems of educational branch managers in local educational directorates as well as their expectations and suggestions on these problems. The study aims to reveal the problems of the branch managers regarding their occupational rights, assignments and duty place changes, roles and status, and their rise in their career steps based on the participants’ opinions and suggestions. In the study, a phenomenological model was used, and qualitative data was collected via standardized open-ended interviews. The working group, determined by snow ball sampling, was composed of 61 branch managers working in 30 different provinces and seven different regions across Turkey. The findings of the study revealed that the branch managers working in local directorates think that their salaries are lower than other educational managerial positions; their workload is quite heavy; they don’t have enough authority, although they have too many responsibilities. The participants also made suggestions for increasing branch managers’ salaries and wages by granting seniority, authority and special service compensation; raising additional indicators for retirement; and having more in-service, postgraduate and doctoral training opportunities. More than 2000 branch managers work in local educational directorates in Turkey however no scientific research about the problems of this local staff has been carried out so far. This study is likely to be the first specific research entirely carried out for local educational branch managers. By means of the study, it is also expected that the occupational problems of this managerial position will be better noticed in local educational management system.

 

Keywords: Branch managers, district and provincial education, professional rights, role and status.


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Bozak, A., Bolat, Y. & Karabulut, B. (2019). To be a branch manager in a local educational directorate: Occupational problems and solutions . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 14(3), 268-289. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2019.208.12

Harvard
Bozak, A., Bolat, Y. and Karabulut, B. (2019). To be a branch manager in a local educational directorate: Occupational problems and solutions . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 14(3), pp. 268-289.

Chicago 16th edition
Bozak, Ahmet, Yavuz Bolat and Bahri Karabulut (2019). "To be a branch manager in a local educational directorate: Occupational problems and solutions ". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 14 (3):268-289. doi:10.29329/epasr.2019.208.12.

References
  1. Arslan M., H. & Atasayar, H., H. (2008). Ideas of the provincial managers of the ministry of    national education about localization. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences,: 41 (2),  59-79.  [Google Scholar]
  2. Bağlıbel, M., Kaygısız, G. M.  & Samancıoğlu, M. (2010). Determining problems between schools and province and district educational directorates. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 9 (1):163-183.     [Google Scholar]
  3. Erkılıç, A. T & Dilbaz, E. (2017). Opinions of the political parties on educational administration, inspection and economy in their election manifestos. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1(2), 1-25.  [Google Scholar]
  4. İcisleri (2019). Mülki ve idari bölümler. Retrieved 27 January 2019 from https://www.e-icisleri.gov.tr/Anasayfa/MulkiIdariBolumleri.aspx.  [Google Scholar]
  5. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştirma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kayıkçı K., Yörük, T. & Atasayar, H., H. (2015). City and county education managers’ opinions on implementation of rotation. Elementary Education Online, 14(1), 200‐215.  [Google Scholar]
  7. Keser-Özmantar, Z. & Sincar, M. (2017). An investigation of the changes in the administrative perception of former teachers promoted as section directors. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 23(1), 73-104.          [Google Scholar]
  8. MEB, (2017). Milli Eğitim Şuraları. http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/suralar/dosya/12.   [Google Scholar]
  9. Neuman, L.,W.(2014). Social research methods:qualitative and quantitative approaches. England: Pearson Education Limited Retrieved 30 January 2019 from http://letrunghieutvu.yolasite.com/resources/w-lawrence-neuman-social-research-methods_-qualitative-and-quantitative-approaches-pearson-education-limited-2013.pdf.  [Google Scholar]
  10. OECD, (2019). More information is available from the OECD Directorate for Education and Skills (www.oecd.org/edu) and its web pages on Education Policy Outlook. Retrieved 27 January 2019 from www.oecd.org/edu/policyoutlook.htm. [Google Scholar]
  11. Punch K. F.  (2005). Introduction to Social Research–Quantitative & Qualitative  Approaches. London: Sage Publications.  [Google Scholar]
  12. Resmi Gazete (2010). 5984 sayılı Milli Eğitim Bakanlığının Teşkilat ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun ile Devlet Memurları Kanunun Bazı Maddelerinin Değiştirilmesine Dair Kanun, 28 January 2019 from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2010/06/20100613-2.htm.   [Google Scholar]
  13. Sarıkamış MEM, (2018). İlçe milli eğitim müdürlüğü görev dağılımı. Retrieved 25 January 2019 from http://sarikamis.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_10/31125148_sarikamis_ilce_milli_egitim_mudurlugu_gorev_dagilimi.pdf.   [Google Scholar]
  14. Şişman, M. & Turan, S. (2004). A study of correlation between job satisfaction and social-emotional loneness of educational administrators in Turkish public schools. Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5 (1), 117-128.  [Google Scholar]
  15. Turkey (2019). Türkiye. Retrieved 28 January 2019 from http://www.columbia.edu/~sss31/Turkiye/edu.html.  [Google Scholar]
  16. Yıldırım,  K. (2010). Raising the Quality in Qualitative Research, Elementary Education  Online, 9(1), 79-92. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yıldırım, A & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştirma yöntemleri. Ankara, Seçkin Yayınları. [Google Scholar]