Review article    |    Open Access
Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2026, Vol. 21(2) 7-20

Bibliometric Analysis of Critical Literacy Studies

meram uzundal, Hakan Dedeoğlu

pp. 7 - 20

Publish Date: June 30, 2026  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0


Abstract

This study presents a bibliometric analysis that systematically examines the scientific literature published in the field of critical literacy (CL). Although research on critical literacy has evolved along three main axes—its theoretical frameworks, pedagogical practices, and social justice perspectives—these dimensions have rarely been analyzed using bibliometric methods. This gap has limited the visibility of academic trends and research voids within the field. The primary aim of the study is to map the development of CL research through seven specific questions concerning publication years, journals, countries, institutional collaborations, citation impacts, and key concepts. Bibliometric analysis was adopted as the research method, and data were retrieved in June 2025 from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection using the search term “critical literacy.” After filtering for English-language journal articles within the “Education Educational Research” category, a total of 1,033 studies were included in the analysis. The VOSviewer software was used to perform network and co-occurrence analyses. Findings revealed comprehensive patterns related to trends, regional and institutional differences, conceptual frameworks, and highly cited works in CL research. The results contribute to the literature by providing a holistic view of the field’s intellectual structure and evolution. The study concludes that future directions of critical literacy are likely to expand toward themes such as digital media, artificial intelligence, social inequalities, and refugee education. It emphasizes that systematic analyses of this nature are vital not only for advancing academic knowledge production but also for informing educational policies, and it recommends promoting interdisciplinary approaches in the field.

Keywords: Critical literacy; Bibliometric analysis; Educational research; Citation networks; Social justice


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
uzundal, m., & Dedeoglu, H. (2026). Bibliometric Analysis of Critical Literacy Studies. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 21(2), 7-20.

Harvard
uzundal, m. and Dedeoglu, H. (2026). Bibliometric Analysis of Critical Literacy Studies. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 21(2), pp. 7-20.

Chicago 16th edition
uzundal, meram and Hakan Dedeoglu (2026). "Bibliometric Analysis of Critical Literacy Studies". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 21 (2):7-20.

References
  1. Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3402_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  2. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder. (2020 baskısı: Freire, P. (2020). In Toward a sociology of education (pp. 374–386). Routledge.) [Google Scholar]
  4. Janks, H. (2000). Domination, access, diversity and design: A synthesis for critical literacy education. Educational Review, 52(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/713664035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lewison, M., Flint, A. S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382–392. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, X., Zhang, D., & Wang, Y. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of critical pedagogy in educational research (2000–2021). Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3459–3480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10773-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 448–461. [Google Scholar]
  9. Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Luke, A. (2018). Two takes on the critical. In B. Comber, A. Luke, & H. Janks (Eds.), Critical literacy, schooling, and social justice (pp. 216–224). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). (2024). Australia: Country profile. https://www.mfa.gov.tr [Google Scholar]
  12. Morrell, E. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pandya, J. Z., & Ávila, J. (2014). Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Rao, R., Williams, C., & Patel, A. (2024). Diversity and inclusion in American education: A critical literacy perspective. Educational Review, 76(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.1987489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Rogers, R. (2014). Coaching literacy teachers as they design critical literacy practices. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.891449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Sánchez, A. D., de la Cruz Del Río Rama, M., & García, J. Á. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Vasquez, V. M. (2004). Negotiating critical literacies with young children. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vasquez, V. M., Janks, H., & Comber, B. (2019). Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Language Arts, 96(5), 300–311. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education. Computers & Education, 122, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]